22 Jul 2018
IDC Research Shows More than 85% of Asia/Pacific Organizations Struggle to Cross the Cloud Maturity Chasm and Gain Agility
Organizations can gain maturity through externally sourced services like IT outsourcing and managed services
SINGAPORE, July 23rd, 2018 – IDC Asia/Pacific’s latest study titled IDC MaturityScape Benchmark: Cloud in Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan), 2018 suggests that more than 85% of the Asia/Pacific organizations are still in the early stages of maturity, which in IDC MaturityScape’s model are referred to as ad hoc and opportunistic stages. Compared to the previous Cloud MaturityScape benchmark study in 2016, over 20% of organizations has progressed from stage one (adhoc) to two (opportunistic). Less organizations are seen to have crossed over from stage two to three (repeatable), which is reflective of the difficulty in crossing the chasm between these two stages.
Progressing to stage three requires significant investments in technology, tools, processes and skills – all of which take time and budget. Internal competencies and skills to support these activities are also relatively low in the region, with most of the skilled resources concentrated in large multi-national enterprises and IT service providers. Thus, organizations that leverage on externally sourced services like IT outsourcing and managed services are the ones who are able to cross this maturity chasm. This is also a key contributing factor to the maturity in cloud adoption seen in developed countries like Australia, New Zealand and Singapore.
IDC believes that the technology gaps between Thrivers* and Survivors** organizations are narrowing because of the maturing technology which results in standardization of cloud services and their ease of adoption. But to progress to more advanced stages in the maturity curve, organizations must adopt a more strategic view of cloud as an enabling technology for business transformation and innovation. Faster time to value and agility is the new driver for cloud adoption. Cost of cloud adoption is rarely justified in the early stage of maturity as the adoption is primarily driven-based on required functionalities from the business.
"Speed and agility has become the key drivers for cloud adoption. More organizations in Asia Pacific are adopting a cloud-first strategy such that cloud infrastructure has now become a preferred option for IT modernization," according to William Lee, Research Director, Cloud Services, IDC Asia/Pacific. "Organizations need more consistent, standardized, and available automated cloud resources to enable developers and LOB teams to execute at speed and cost. Workload portability and application delivery across multiple clouds will be key to build a robust cloud services delivery platform for agility."
This study is a supplement to IDC MaturityScape: Cloud 2.0 (IDC #259534, October 2015). These two reports provide a comprehensive overview of IDC's MaturityScape framework for cloud, which aims to assist organizations in realistically appraising their current capabilities, articulating reasonable short- and long-term goals, identifying their gaps, and beginning an action plan for change. The IDC MaturityScape specifically defines the stages, critical measures, business outcomes, and actions that are required to effectively move through the stages and increase value as more investments are made. Using the maturity measures and descriptions in the document, organizations can:
• Understand exactly what sets "thriving" organizations apart from "surviving" organizations, based on their maturity scores
• Understand industry and peer group expectations for business outcomes and IT outcomes for an increasingly mature (sophisticated) use of cloud in how organizations operationalize their internal IT assets and how they source capability on the public (provider-based) cloud
• Understand the supporting processes, governance models, technologies, and skills to deliver cloud-based service delivery models to their internal customers
• Identify gaps in overall cloud management capabilities based on the aforementioned criteria — or more broadly, vision, technology, people, and process
For more information on this report, IDC MaturityScape Benchmark: Cloud in Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan), 2018 (AP44111918, July 2018), please contact William Lee at email@example.com. For media inquiries, please contact Tessa Rago firstname.lastname@example.org or Alvin Afuang email@example.com.
About IDC MaturityScape Benchmark
IDC MaturityScape Benchmark reports aid in the discussion of IT strategy and technology investments by helping IT executives and their enterprise partners gauge where their enterprise is in relation to that of their peers and competitors, best achievers, and the least invested. By utilizing IDC benchmark data, IDC MaturityScape Benchmarks enable organizations to compare maturity against peers, pinpoint which dimensions of an initiative peer organizations are more mature in, and identify the benefits organizations achieve as they move to more mature stages. This benchmark study focused on organizations with more than 500 employees globally, and more than 100 employees countrywide, including all subsidies and branches.
International Data Corporation (IDC) is the premier global provider of market intelligence, advisory services, and events for the information technology, telecommunications, and consumer technology markets. With more than 1,100 analysts worldwide, IDC offers global, regional, and local expertise on technology and industry opportunities and trends in over 110 countries. IDC's analysis and insight helps IT professionals, business executives, and the investment community to make fact-based technology decisions and to achieve their key business objectives. Founded in 1964, IDC is a subsidiary of IDG, the world's leading technology media, research, and events company. To learn more about IDC, please visit www.idc.com. Follow IDC on Twitter at @IDC.
*Thrivers: Organizations in which digital transformation leadership, in aggregate, exceeded expectations and created
**Survivors: Organizations in which digital transformation leadership, in aggregate, did not meet expectations or did not create
any new opportunities.