By Bo Lykkegaard, Associate VP for Software Research Europe with advice and review by Ewa Zborowska, Research Director, AI, Europe
Providers of SaaS solutions across the world have been through the market capitalization bloodbath during the past six months. Despite presenting solid indicators of growth and margins for 2025, almost all publicly traded companies have seen share price reductions 10% to 60% with the average reduction being in the 30-35% range.
Forget about looming trade wars, recession fears, missed revenue goals, and other conventional share price depressants. This is about AI disruption of the current SaaS user experience, licensing model, and product architecture. Investors are starting to fear that the SaaS ‘rental model for software’ will become invisible ‘featureware’ inside an AI agent layer.
What Are the Market Cap Reductions Telling Us?
We have examined the market cap reductions of public traded SaaS vendors over the past six months. Based upon this, we can make the following observations:
- All SaaS vendors are affected across solution areas, geographies, size of vendor, recent growth KPIs, and size focus (SMB vs. enterprise). This means that investors are reexamining their assumptions related to SaaS growth prospects in general.
- Vendors of workflow automation solutions and vendors targeting small and medium-sized businesses appear particularly exposed. Commercial workflow software is seen as exposed to replacement by new AI agent technologies. Also, vendors targeting small businesses are seen as more exposed to churn and price pressures.
- SaaS vendors headquartered in EMEA do not appear harder hit than those headquartered in North America and the market cap correction has hit the largest as well as the smaller SaaS vendors.
Changes that All SaaS Vendors Are Facing
Firstly, the conventional SaaS user experience must change. In a conventional SaaS application, the user executes tasks manually within defined workflows. In an AI-powered application, the system adds to these structured workflows with probabilistic outputs, where it generates, predicts, recommends, or executes. Also, AI-powered applications can accept and react to all kinds of conversational user inputs. Furthermore, just like today’s LLM-based apps, business applications understand context and remember past interactions, which make recommendations and predictions more relevant and precise. Finally, AI-powered business applications are more proactive in nature and help users with monitoring tasks and relevant notifications.
Secondly, the conventional SaaS licensing model must evolve. The talk of the town these days is ‘outcome-based pricing’, i.e. the notion of pricing an application on outcomes (e.g. number of invoices issued) as opposed to number of users. If agentic workflows increasingly automate core business processes in the future, the user of a, say, financial application will be an agentic workflow as opposed to a human user. As AI agents increasingly become users of business applications, the user-based revenue model of SaaS application collapses. Investors are looking for SaaS vendors to at least align licensing better to business outcomes.
Thirdly, the conversional SaaS product architecture must be rethought. Adding AI to a conventional SaaS solution in the form of a chatbot or other form of AI-generated add-on does not make a meaningful difference. Real modernization requires rethinking the SaaS workflow from the ground up. AI changes all levels of the SaaS product stack and needs foundation model(s), embedding layer, vector database, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), orchestration layer, guardrails, monitoring, and prompt/version management.
AI is making several other significant changes in SaaS. Development and maintenance as well as running costs have become more volatile and unpredictable. Data management requires new approaches, as application data now serves as a key source for training AI-powered SaaS solutions. Product roadmaps and release cadences are increasingly driven by AI model upgrades rather than traditional update schedules. Software vendors face new risk management challenges related to hallucinations and regulatory compliance. And both vendors and end-user organizations need to adapt their teams with new sets of skills. And most importantly, the overall competitive landscape has shifted, with AI-based startups and hyperscaler offerings emerging as new challengers.
Additional AI-Related Considerations for SaaS Vendors in Europe, Middle East and Africa
The changes above certainly apply to SaaS vendors in Europe. However, in addition, vendors in Europe – as they adapt solutions and business models to become AI-driven – must pay particular attention to four areas in order to successfully transform.
Firstly, there is the GDPR, NIS2 and EU AI Act compliance, often accompanied by various national or industry-specific regulations. If they cannot document and showcase complete compliance to customers, they cannot sell their AI-powered solutions to compliance-sensitive European organizations.
Secondly, increasingly we see data residency requirements from customers in Europe, particularly in public services, financial services, and healthcare. Buyers in such industries can require EU-hosted data and sovereign cloud guarantees and approaches and can seek to avoid subjection to the US CLOUD Act and to exposing data for foundation model training.
Thirdly, Europe is multi-lingual and buyers require multi-language model performance. A conversational SaaS application is great but only if the conversation happens in the local European language where the application is deployed. We have seen many cases where non-English conversational capabilities are years behind English.
Fourth, European AI-powered SaaS vendors should expect higher demand for transparency and explainability. European customers have a strong preference for understanding how AI systems make decisions, a need often reinforced by regulations like GDPR and the EU AI Act. This means vendors must provide clear logic behind decision criteria, bias mitigation documentation, human oversight mechanisms, and comprehensive audit trails. Black box AI approaches such as “Pick this candidate because the recruiting application assigned a high AI score” simply will not fly in Europe, where trust is key and it heavily depends on being able to trace and justify how conclusions are reached.
Join the Conversation
At IDC, we help you navigate these changes with deep market research, robust data analytics, and tailored custom solutions. Whether you need strategic insights, benchmarking, or support in adapting your business model, our experts are ready to guide you.
Contact us to discuss your unique challenges and discover how IDC can empower your next steps in the evolving, AI-disrupted European software landscape.
Sources:
