In March 2022, IDC asked 885 European employees that had confessed to be looking for alternative employment about their motivation for doing so. The top reason was, unsurprisingly, better pay. What was more interesting was that “better working environment (i.e., a better employee experience)” was almost as high among the reasons for job change. It showed that today, work is less about paying the bills and advancing a career. It is much about personal development and fulfillment, as well as being a social and collaborative experience.

One year later, in March 2023, similar questions to 790 employees that were looking for a new job. The proportion of employees citing “better work environment / better corporate culture” was 48%, up from 42% the year before, and just 1% point behind “better pay”. So, not only are the ‘soft’ values important to employees, but they are becoming more and more important. Inflation could also play a role in this detachment from the “hard work” paradigm (i.e. hard as working hard to reach higher levels in the company / higher level of salary). The price increases undermined salaries and dream of the salary-based buying power that we saw previously.

Is it become the strenuous, ‘blue collar’ jobs are disappearing while ‘white collar’, knowledge worker jobs are taking over? The data does not support this hypothesis. All workers, regardless of whether they are desk workers or store/factory/field workers have “better pay” as the #1 motivation to look for a new job. Also, all workers have “better work environment / better corporate culture” as a key motivation for looking for a new job. Knowledge or desk workers are relatively interested in a better corporate culture, while store/factory/field workers are relatively interested in better teams / change of colleagues. Instead, it looks like all work types are becoming more knowledge intensive and bigger part of the individual identify, which prompts all employees to place higher value on work environment, culture, leadership, etc., as opposed to pay.

Dissecting “Employee Experience” to Understand Employee Work Motivation

In the March 2022 European employee survey, we also set out to understand which aspects of “employee experience” were more important to employees. We defined seven fundamental aspects of employee experience and asked the employees to rate these in terms of importance. We discovered that relatively ‘soft’ aspects of work, namely corporate culture and leadership & employer brand, were the most important factors of the seven, and more important for employees than we previously assumed.In the March 2023 European employee survey, we wanted to deep dive into the work culture and leadership aspects of the employee experience. In other words, we wanted to find out what was behind the emphasis on these topics among European employees. Again, we asked employees to rate the importance of a number of subtopics underneath work culture and leadership.

The result showed a remarkable drive amongst the employees for purpose in their work, for a sense of meaningful contribution, for personal development and for fairness. This applied to all types of workers, from desk workers over field workers to staff in stores/warehouses/factories. This drive for purpose implies a number of employee requirements around open communication, leadership integrity, fairness in recognition and compensation, etc. And these requirements are indeed reflected in the top aspects of the two pillars under investigation, work culture and leadership, respectively, as shown in the figures below.

General Implications for Organizations: New Leadership Styles Are Called For

Gone are the days of secluded top managers running organizations in separation from the myriad of employees carrying out instructions and work. Most management experts might comment that this ‘new’ style of open, visionary, and inclusive leadership have been practices for decades already. However, the results of both the 2022 and 2023 surveys suggest that most European organizations still have far to go. The survey data showed that the two most important employee experience pillars, “People-First Culture” and “Leadership and Employer Branding”, were also the two pillars with the largest gap between importance and employee’s rating of their current employer. In other words, the two pillars of the highest level of disappointment with the current employer.

The survey data also showed that for the detailed aspects of these two employee experience pillars, the most important aspects were also the aspects with the largest improvement potential. “Open and timely communication” sounds easy but is often very difficult to carry out successfully in practice. Among the general implications for organizations are:

  • Leadership development, especially in the area of soft skills, is critical.
  • Executive search must place higher emphasis on aspects such as empathy, integrity, and communication skills.
  • Enhancing work culture and leadership communication are new strategic areas where HR can make a difference for organizations.

Implications for HCM Software Vendors: New Solution Types Will See High Demand

Software solutions also have a role to play in remediation of the current culture and leadership shortcomings. In many cases, new HCM solutions will be needed to improve processes related to communication, recognition, compensation, and recruiting. We see particular opportunities in the areas below:

  • Compensation management
  • Management development training
  • Pay gap and Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) analytics
  • Employee engagement & rewards
  • Employee performance management
  • Recruiting solutions & applicant tracking solutions

 

Please see the following IDC studies (behind paywall) for more information:

Bo Lykkegaard - Associate VP for Software Research Europe - IDC

Bo Lykkegaard is associate vice president for the enterprise-software-related expertise centers in Europe. His team focuses on the $172 billion European software market, specifically on business applications, customer experience, business analytics, and artificial intelligence. Specific research areas include market analysis, competitive analysis, end-user case studies and surveys, thought leadership, and custom market models.

2023 is the year of efficiency and IT optimization.

Cloud computing continues to play a central role for European enterprise IT, so are IT costs. Consequently, avoiding or reducing cloud resource waste is a top C-Suites’ priority.

FinOps is fast becoming a critical part of IT organizations’ strategy for its systematic approach to managing costs and optimizing cloud resources. It provides insights into spending, usage trends, and preferences as well as helps in forecast and change management.

Why FinOps Is Important in Europe

In today’s fast-paced world, inflation, skills gap, supply chain disruptions, and political tensions are reshaping the tech landscape and have significantly impacted IT spend in Europe. In fact, European businesses are more likely to pay more attention to their costs and spendings.

In Europe, public cloud pricing complexity is causing a tremendous shock to customers. In fact, SaaS and software application costs related to licenses and subscriptions are the second and fifth categories that had the greatest impact on costs, according to IDC EMEA, FERS Survey Europe, Wave 1: January 20 – February 3, 2023 (N=340).

Not surprisingly, increasing vendors pricing (43%), impact of recession on expected business revenue (23%), and staff/labour shortages (22%) are among the most concerned risk factors related to the European organizations’ tech strategies and budget in 2023, according to IDC EMEA, FERS Survey Europe, Wave 5:  June 2023 (N=340).

This is bringing additional scrutiny on cloud spend and cloud ROI. Over two thirds of European organizations believe their total cloud spending is not properly utilized, according to IDC European CloudOps survey, 2023 (N=1,057). Here is where FinOps comes in.

Already 46% of organizations have adopted FinOps in Europe, albeit with varied levels of maturity. But the direction of travel is clear, and it brings huge opportunities for cloud vendors to mitigate cost risks around unused resources, costs allocation, and sustainability as a direct result of waste reduction.

Concurrently, FinOps is seen as a solution in Europe, with some cloud vendors to be very active in the first half of the year. IBM, for instance, has just acquired Apptio to enhance its leadership in the FinOps space while Datadog introduced Cloud Costs Management, which further enhances the collaboration between FinOps and engineering teams to remove friction and reduce cloud costs.

Public cloud vendors are acutely aware of the cost pressures and are investing in offering native cost optimization capabilities.

For instance, AWS Cloud Financial Management (CFM) is aimed at helping organizations measure their AWS environments’ cost while providing prescriptive guidance to cost-related pain points such as lack of visibility or instance sprawl or workload rationalization. Microsoft Azure provides multiple features such as Azure Pricing Calculator and Total Cost of Ownership Calculator (TCO) to help users estimate cloud costs.

It has Azure Resource Manager to allocate costs through the creation of tags, and Microsoft Cost Management to report, benchmark, and forecast costs. Similar tools are offered by Google Cloud Platform too. It has Pricing Calculator and Rightsize Recommender to help users compare architectures costs and provide insights on whether and where to save money.

Enterprises are looking to optimize their cloud resources, control their cloud costs, and deliver innovation while creating value to both their businesses and customers. FinOps is focused on long-term value and reliability, but the outcome of an efficient implementation can already be seen in the short time through the optimization of operations and cutting costs.

Cloud spend discipline is essential and FinOps is seen as critical now more than ever before. The good news is this demand is driving a lot of cloud vendors and third-party niche vendors to offer cost visibility and optimization recommendation platforms. It is an interesting and dynamic market, one to watch closely.

 

Contact Filippo Vanara to learn more about IDC’s European FinOps Research.

We are a very inquisitive species with a remarkable long-term record of adaptation and with even more remarkable recent accomplishments in making the lives of most of the world’s population healthier, richer, safer, and longer. Still, fundamental constraints persist: We have changed some of them through our ingenuity, but such adjustments have their own limits.

— Vaclav Smil, How the World Really Works (2022)

 

The industry sector needs resources more than ever, particularly rare minerals. Even as the hunt for such resources intensifies, the industry is pushing to achieve sustainable growth and meet new environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals.

According to the Copper Alliance, renewable energy systems require up to 12x more copper than traditional energy systems. Copper demand is expected to increase nearly 600% by 2030.

Renault’s Chairman Jean-Dominique Senard told Reuters news agency: “If there’s a real geopolitical crisis, the damage to battery factories solely powered by products coming from outside will be considerable.”

According to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, reducing industry’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions requires coordinated action across value chains. Such action includes circular material flows and transformational changes in production processes.

The manufacturing industry remains at the forefront of efforts to reduce the impacts of extracting natural resources and to secure materials that enable low-carbon production. But to meet these and other challenges, organizations must continue to find efficient ways to transform their value chains into closed-loop flows of the basic materials needed to extend product lifetimes. And they should double down on their recycling programs by finding ways to turn materials from end-of-life products into completely new products.

A series of game changers have been pushing organizations to be more efficient with resources and to adopt the principles of the circular economy. These include:

  • Organizations have been adopting sustainability policies that call for them to reduce their carbon footprints to at least net zero.
  • The massive spread of electromobility has turned the EV battery business, and the rare minerals needed for such batteries, into critical assets.
  • The COVID-19 crisis showed that it can be risky to depend on third parties to transport strategic materials around the world.
  • Digital technology has developed significantly in the past three years, especially in terms of cloud-based digital platforms and IT infrastructure, artificial intelligence-powered digital tools, and generative AI engines.

Manufacturing organizations, at least in theory, are in an ideal position to make circular principles inseparable from operations. Operationalizing circular principles at scale, however, remains one of the biggest challenges for managers across lines of business and industries.

In IDC’s 2022 global survey of 1,300+ manufacturing organizations, 58% of respondents said they have already incorporated circular economy principles into operations including design and production processes, waste reuse, and local sourcing of resources. Two-fifths (43%) of respondents said that shrinking carbon emissions and their CO2 footprints are key elements of achieving their ESG/sustainability strategic business goals. Two-fifths (41%) of respondents also cited the goals of reducing waste and driving cost efficiencies.

Reduced carbon production, as well as cost reductions driven by the optimized use of materials, labor, and assets, are some of the benefits organizations are receiving after adopting circular economy principles.

The auto industry is pioneering circularity principles in operations, particularly in the area of EV and EV battery production.

  • In 2022, General Motors announced an initiative to recover and reuse the raw material in its Ultium battery packs, thus driving down costs and making the manufacturer’s EVs even more sustainable.
  • Stellantis established a Circular Economy Business Unit whose objective is to “extend the life of vehicles and parts, ensuring that they last for as long as possible, and returning material and end-of-life vehicles to the manufacturing loop for new vehicles and products.” According to the company’s website, multi-brand parts that are still in good condition are recovered from end-of-life vehicles and sold in 155 countries through the B-Partsecommerce platform.
  • Renault’s “The Future Is NEUTRAL” entity aims to scale the closed-loop automotive circular economy, with the aim of moving the automotive industry toward resource neutrality.

These are all great initiatives that seek to improve material resiliency, make more efficient use of resources across the value chain, slow the impacts of climate change, and deliver sustainable profit and increased customer trust.

 

Download eBook: Sustainability in EMEA: Opportunities for Tech Vendors, Challenges for Tech Buyers

 

Operational Challenges

The following is a brief rundown of the operational challenges that organizations must tackle to reach a meaningful level of profitable circularity.

  • Fragmented Approach: Many organizations lack a clear, unified strategy and circular principles are thus applied opportunistically, mostly in production areas where the effort can bring immediate benefits or solves obvious issues.
  • Logistics: Many organizations struggle with insufficient production infrastructure and related logistics. Applying remanufacturing and repair to current operational setups significantly reduces overall efficiency during production, warehousing, and delivery processes.
  • Transparency and Flexibility: Implementation of circular principles in operations requires absolute transparency, traceability, and operational flexibility. To secure circular principles during the entire life cycle of the product, data related to the product’s usage must be captured and shared in real time in an autonomous, touchless way.

Faced with these challenges, a digital thread — a closed loop between the physical product and its digital representative — can provide relevant feedback to the product’s lifetime stakeholders. To make such data flows reality, however, several technology elements must converge, including ubiquitous connectivity, IoT, digital twins, and data capturing and sharing via cloud-based digital platforms.

Detailed transparency requires seamless integration of enterprise software. Examples of such systems include product life-cycle management, bills of material hierarchy, enterprise resource planning with remanufacturing functionality, logistics management, manufacturing management platforms, and servicing platforms.

Up-front costs and investments can be significant barriers to circularity. Achieving meaningful impact at scale requires coordination across functions and the involvement of various stakeholders inside and even outside of the company.

Suppliers, reverse logistics providers, remanufacturing and repair centers, customers, and technology partners must be coordinated into a perfectly synchronized machine. A circular environment is far more complex than traditional chains. Organizations may be challenged to create a business case with a short ROI.

Organizations must also determine whether circular principles can be applied to a product that is already in production — or if circular product design and management should instead be implemented only for new products, at the beginning of their life cycles.

Going “circular native,” as I term this last option, was very important to 46%, and extremely important for 38%, of respondents to an IDC Manufacturing Insights survey. “Circular native” is not defined by materials or extended life cycles but by a connection via digital thread to data sharing across a product’s entire lifetime.

The operationalization of circularity requires solid collaboration among procurement, engineering, and supply chain managers, especially during the design and supplier selection process.

It must also be acknowledged that the complexity of supply chains can make it challenging to establish closed-loop systems. Collaboration and coordination among suppliers, customers, and other partners are necessary for efficient material flows. And resource recovery must be underpinned by digital technology (e.g., cloud-based supply chain control towers).

 

Register for the webcast: Sustainability in EMEA: The Challenge of Moving from Ambition to Action

 

Boiling the Ocean?

For some leaders, embedding circularity principles in manufacturing operations — including reengineering product specifications according to circular principles — may feel a bit like “boiling the ocean,” or undertaking a seemingly impossible or unnecessarily difficult task.

Yet there are a great many benefits to providing data on technology processes and supply chains to stakeholders in real time. Products connected via digital thread to closed-loop stakeholders can help organizations better manage the product’s life-cycle bill of materials, collect data to improve the next generation of the product, and contextualize product data with current point-of-use data to provide a complex view of the product’s life-cycle status.

To achieve circular economy success, circular principles must be embedded across the entire product life cycle, including packaging. And the digital twin of the product must be integrated with a cloud data platform.

Circularity is not just about utilizing sustainable and recyclable materials: Life extension is a significant element. The most sustainable material is one that doesn’t need to be processed. Repair and remanufacturing are thus integral steps of the product life cycle.

Circularity also requires investments in digital tools capable of handling manufacturing processes in which input and output indicators may not always be well defined. Manufacturers that tackle this challenge should consider dedicated software enhanced with features like reverse bills of material, disassembly, expected recovery and kitting, remanufactured parts management, and remanufacturing pricing with core changes.

Data and contextualized life-cycle information, including carbon emissions, is a real enabler of the optimization of circularity principles in the manufacturing and supply chain environment.

In today’s hyperconnected world, moving from fascination with, to visualization, to implementation of circular principles isn’t viable without reliable and secure digital infrastructure, relevant digital tools, and AI-powered technology.

 

Bottom line: When it comes to securing material resiliency and achieving ESG goals, there is no time for hesitation or inertia!

 

To find out more about manufacturing visit our website, or to find out more about the framework-based guidance on how manufacturers can develop and deploy circular principles in their operations, click here.

Europe is gradually recovering from the worst energy crisis in a generation, which started as a tight supply market in 2021 and quickly escalated into a full-blown global supply shock, with energy prices peaking in Q3 2022 at levels unseen in decades. This year, as prices and supply readjust to profoundly changed market fundamentals, Europeans are weighing the long-term consequences of this crisis on their consumption behavior, the cost of doing business and broader decarbonization strategy.

In this context, energy efficiency has quickly risen to the top of the business and policy discourse, not only as a tactical tool to tackle higher energy prices today, but also as a key foundation of the EU’s climate transition under the ‘Fit for 55’ strategy.

In the near term, energy efficiency can improve consumer resilience, helping them cope with a higher cost environment. In the medium term, it should make it relatively less painful for Europe to regain its lost energy security, helping reduce energy dependency and diversify supplier risk.

Longer-term, it has the potential for lowering the cost of the energy transition by reducing the investment needed to decarbonize power production and electrify energy use.

Converging Towards Energy Efficiency: Policies, Prices and Demand Across Sectors

From a market standpoint, the time is ripe for Europe to raise its energy efficiency game as it now sits at the convergence of three critical enablers of a functioning energy services market.

  1. Policies and subsidies. Several pieces of legislation are being (or have recently been) rolled out that will accelerate changes in the way energy is used and produced in the EU. The most critical one on the use side of the balance is the ongoing revision of the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED), others include revisions of Directives covering the Energy Performance of Buildings, Renewable Energy and Energy Taxation.
  2. Energy prices. In June 2023, EU wholesale electricity and gas prices were still more than 70% and 2.7 times higher than in June 2019, respectively. Pivoting away from cheap and abundant piped Russian gas to new supplies (including via LNG, with all the related infrastructure and transport complexities) means the market may remain tight, resulting in higher prices than pre-2021 levels in the medium term.
  3. Market demand. In just one year, the energy crisis has done more to fuel the European consumer’s demand for energy efficiency than decades of direct incentives and tax credits. Especially for commercial and industrial energy consumers, from process manufacturers to food retailers and hospitals, the tactical need to react to higher energy cost is triggering investments that can serve these businesses well in their longer-term decarbonization plans. In the immediate aftermath of the energy crisis – IDC data shows – almost half of European businesses were planning to improve the efficiency of their energy use to limit the impact of higher energy prices on the cost of doing business. At the same time, between 50% and 60% were planning to invest in energy efficiency (both data- and capital investment-driven) as part of their broader decarbonization strategies.

This renewed focus has profound implications not only for energy suppliers and service providers but also for large and small energy consumers across European industries and their technical ecosystems.

European manufacturers and retailers, for example, have long been working on their energy mix and consumption to generate cost efficiencies, meet growing customer expectations and target ambitious long-term sustainability goals. In today’s energy price environment, however, energy efficiency has become critical to sustain profitability and competitiveness. This is particularly the case for organizations competing with non-European producers that have access to cheaper energy supplies.

Manufacturing

While energy efficiency has always been a consideration for manufacturing organizations, access to relatively cheap energy, loose regulatory requirements and the lack of effective digital technology led to some complacency in the past. Nowadays, manufacturers have the ability to contextualize and analyze real-time data by breaking down data silos across their IT and OT estate. With access to data, technology owners on the shop floor can adjust production plans and material routes accordingly.

Additionally, energy efficiency initiatives have the long-term potential to help manufacturers jump-start broader data-driven process improvement strategies. For example, a prominent Tier 1 global automotive supplier successfully connected over 250 energy-related data points. The energy management system allowed the company to analyze the energy consumption of injection molding machines for each produced part. With this data, not only could the company adjust production equipment and determine the most efficient injection molding machine based on the parts being produced but also detect and alert supervisors of equipment anomalies.

Retail

Retailers too are prioritizing the implementation of energy management systems in their retail operations, along with a growing focus on supply chain and logistics efficiency, to minimize overall energy consumption.

For retailers in particular, implementing energy-efficient technologies and practices goes well beyond sustaining profitability and competitiveness. As consumers become increasingly conscious of the environmental impact of their purchases, energy efficiency becomes a clear first step towards achieving sustainability goals that align with such changing preferences.

This should not be viewed (only) as a way to enhance brand reputation and attract environmentally conscious consumers, but rather materially help them improve their environmental footprint. For example, at the beginning of the energy crisis, one of the UK’s leading food and grocery retailers strengthened its commitment to tackling the climate crisis. This meant cutting as many as five years from its target to become carbon neutral in its business and operations (Scope 1 and 2), by 2035. To do so, the grocer is focusing on maximizing the energy efficiency of its operations, reducing carbon emissions, food waste, plastic packaging, water usage, and increasing recycling.

Healthcare

For European healthcare organizations, higher energy prices are rubbing salt in the wound of the enormous resource strain caused by two years of pandemic.

The sector is one of the largest and most sophisticated energy consumers and hospitals are typically among a territory’s most energy-intensive buildings. Not only medical equipment and healthcare facilities, on which patients’ lives depend, necessitate 24/7 power supply. But within the same hospital, each of those facilities and departments have their own requirements in terms of access, lighting, temperature and humidity, cleanliness and air filtration, availability of water, power, medical gases and communications.

With healthcare fees typically lagging inflation, often by several years, and with energy bills up by as much as 100% or more since 2021, energy prices are not only hurting hospitals’ bottom lines but diverting crucial resources from patient care. This adds to inflation increasing the cost of medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, medical logistics and other expenses outside core operations.

In this context, European hospitals are prioritizing efforts to reduce energy consumption (and limit their carbon emissions in the process) without impacting the quality and safety of day-to-day care.

Two investment areas are worth calling out. Adopting sustainable design principles for new builds using, for example, parametric modelling to track the rise and fall of the sun in different seasons, allowing to make the most of natural light and solar radiation. Plans for rooftop solar are also increasing, enabling hospitals to self-generate and decarbonize part of their energy needs. Deploying smart assets and measurement systems is also on the rise, to monitor temperatures, air quality, occupancy and overall humidity and optimize operations.

Public Sector

European Governments and public administrations, for their part, will have an increasingly relevant role to play going forward. They are expected to not only regulate and orchestrate but actually lead the energy transition, demonstrating best practices and setting a benchmark against which other organizations can measure themselves.

The proposed revision of the EU EED is a case in point. It firmly establishes that the public sector should have an “exemplary role” underscored by specific, more aggressive energy efficiency goals than the rest of the economy. Similarly, the UK Government’s Net Zero Strategy states that “the wider public sector will lead by example during the transition to net zero.”

This is critical because governments are among the largest contributors to European economies. They have their own significant direct environmental footprint and therefore have a critical influence on the journey to net zero. For example, in the UK, the Government estimates that emissions from public buildings account for approximately 2% of total UK emissions. And this only includes estimates of fuel burnt not wider scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.

Driven by regulation, higher energy prices, NextGeneration EU funding, and public expectations, local, regional and national governments are putting in place measures to improve the efficiency of their biggest emitters – transport fleets and public buildings and assets.

IDC research highlights that, across Europe, 37% of governments are investing in building energy management systems and nearly 60% are investing in workplace management systems to optimize space utilization and occupancy. It must be noted that a selection of government departments, due to their size and function generate the bulk of public sector emissions.

For instance, the Ministry of Defence is estimated to account for 50% of the UK central government emissions; therefore, accelerating energy efficiency measures in those departments is essential.

Financial Services

As a relatively less energy-intensive sector, the direct effects of higher energy costs on the financial services industry were less critical than for others. The major energy consumers in financial services are data centers and, to a lesser degree, office buildings, and even for these the increase in cost remained manageable.

Financial services, however, play a critical role in enabling the energy transition of their corporate and consumer customers through the issuance of green and social bonds, credit and other financing options. The surge in energy prices, however, will likely have delayed the net-zero targets of banks’ lending portfolios, as customers have been forced to use working capital to pay their energy bills.

The bigger dilemma however is that, in addition to renewables, diversification from Russian gas will require major investments in oil and gas exploration and import infrastructures, which is fundamentally countering Europe’s green deal policies.

In autumn 2022 there were also concerns that energy suppliers and the energy-intensive industries may bend under the crisis, which increased the pressure on banks to prepare for loan defaults. Thanks largely to the estimated €758 billion (Source: Bruegel) in fiscal policy measures allocated by European government to protecting consumers from rising energy costs (including nationalization of energy utility giants Uniper and EDF), European banks only saw a marginal increase in loan defaults.

Overall, the energy crisis may have slowed down the green transformation of the financial services industry asset base, but the long-term opportunities of going net-zero remain sound.

Utilities

Finally, turning to the supply side of the energy balance, energy and utility companies represent the business and infrastructure backbone of the energy transition.

Over the past five to 10 years there has a been a substantial uptick in investment by European utilities and energy suppliers in the energy services (ESCo) space. From diversified energy companies to international electric utilities, energy infrastructure operators and municipal multi-utilities, many traditional players have added energy management technology and efficiency capabilities to their portfolios.

For example, between 2015 and 2019, a major European power utility acquired companies covering the full stack of B2B energy technology and services. The resulting ESCo offers energy analytics and energy management technology, financing and operations of solar, storage and co-generation plants, energy audit services and performance contracting, as well as demand side response solutions.

The strategic intent is clearly to integrate horizontally by adding to the existing commodity business a set of solutions that enable customers to consume more sustainably and cost-effectively, in an effort to meet the growing demand for efficiency. The energy crisis has obviously provided fresh impetus to this type of strategies. To reflect this acceleration, at the end of last year, IDC predicted that by 2025, a third of competitive gentailers would set up integrated supply, efficiency, decarbonization, and electrification service portfolios, growing average profit per customer by more than 20%.

 

Contributing analysts: Jan Burian, Adriana Allocato, Massimiliano Claps, Louisa Barker, Tom Zink and Filippo Battaini

For more in-depth insights into industry coverage, visit our website.