One of the key measures I like to use when talking to the C-Suite about their digital transformation initiatives is to ask how much revenue do digital products, services and experiences bring to the business, as well as how much is expected. This simple, but telling, question lets me know how mature they are, and if they are well on their way to employing a digital-first strategy. 

Back in 2019, the percentage of revenue attributed to digitally enhanced products, services and experiences was less than 5% of total revenue. Today, our recent IDC CEO Sentiment Survey shows that it’s over 20%, and by 2027 it’s expected to be more than 40% of total company revenue.

How a business operates during its experimentation stages of digital transformation is vastly different from more mature digital businesses. As enterprises scale their innovation and transformation capabilities, a trigger point is reached that causes it to start to think about a digital-first strategy. We’ve seen this accelerate because of the pandemic, with examples from the health sector, port authorities, retail, financial institutions, as well as government services. Today, 90% of Asia/Pacific organizations are in various stages of executing their digital-first strategies.

At the same time, IDC’s Future Enterprise Wave 7 Survey (Aug 2022) show that CEOs who champion digital-first strategies are more concerned about reaching ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) goals and creating an innovation culture, and use these as critical levers in running a digital business compared to their peers.  Project failure rates also drop by as much as 13 percentage points as a result of a CEO champion.

While there are many benefits, one of the biggest challenges mentioned when running a digital business is transitioning to new metrics on how business value is measured. Even mature digital businesses say that business value realization can be difficult to achieve partly because of how legacy metrics and measures are used during this critical time of transition. 

A more holistic approach is to use a mix of internal and external oriented metrics to align financial performance in the short term, and ecosystem and sustainability impacts over the longer time horizon. The same Future Enterprise Survey shows that close to half of organizations who consider themselves a digital business agree that ESG impacts, and ecosystem contributions constitute part of the enterprise business value. Yet, in practice, only 28% of the same organizations are using sustainability metrics and 26% are using ecosystem metrics as success measures.

Over the last 12 months we have seen measuring ESG impact and value generated from digital ecosystems rise above more traditional and lagging financial metrics. I think these measures will only rise in importance, as purpose-driven culture and shared values across the digital ecosystem creates new businesses that have social, economic and sustainable outcomes.

One such example is Tsingtao Brewery in Qingdao, China, which has not only successfully deployed digital solutions to reduce lead time to address consumer demands for customized orders but is also looking at using technology to achieve sustainable business growth.

Kexing Huang, Chairman and CEO of Tsingtao Brewery, said “Consumers expect a good product, but also a company that has values and produces in a green and simple manner. By using new technology, we can improve our efficiency and reduce energy consumption and incorporate green and sustainable development to the whole value chain.”[1]

In transforming into digital business that can align both short- and long-term goals, it’s not only business models that are undergoing complex changes, but as a result, organizational and operating model changes are occurring to support a more agile, data-driven and collaborative culture.

The same Future Enterprise Wave 7 Survey mentioned earlier shows that Asia/Pacific organizations’ top challenges in running a digital business are (1) building a data-driven business and culture, (2) engaging with new digital ecosystems, and (3) modernizing their operating models. Digital ecosystems are integral to digital business models where value creation activities are orchestrated across the value chain using technology, connectivity, and shared data. This brings in cascading ramifications to the enterprise’s operating and organizational models which needs to change in a lockstep fashion to be executed successfully.

It is in my belief that building up next generation digital business platforms forms the core part of the solution in addressing these complex and interconnected challenges.

To become a digital business, organizations must orchestrate change – rebuild one’s digital foundation, while competing and innovating in the digital marketplace. I akin this to an orchestra where each part of the symphony plays an equally undismissible role. The foundational bass, the harmonic brass, and the melodic strings each represents the sturdy digital foundation, compelling digital offerings, and delightful innovations required to bring a masterpiece composition to life. With its data fabric, the platform represents an orchestration point in harmonizing change so as to manifest the melody of a purposeful business.

I hope to showcase to you leading organizations in the Asia/Pacific region at IDC’s Future Enterprise Awards 2022, where we have seen how these changes resulted in new direct-to-consumer experiences, radically overhauled HR practices, recalibrated finance systems and data-driven supply chain visibility.  I hope to see you all in Singapore as we unpack the Digital Business Era and announce this year’s Future Enterprise Award winners for the Asia/Pacific region.


Linus Lai - Group Vice President, Research - IDC

Linus Lai is a distinguished member at IDC Asia/Pacific, in which he spearheads research in digital business, trust, infrastructure, and services. With over 25 years of industry experience, Linus is based in Sydney and serves as the chief analyst for Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). He is a founding member of IDC's Emerging Technology Advisory Council and a respected senior member of the region's CIO100, CSO, and Future Enterprise awards. In his role, Linus provides strategic insights for digital leaders and the technology sector, focusing on sourcing strategies and emerging technology across Asia/Pacific. His expertise has earned him numerous accolades for his contributions to country, regional, and quality research. Previously, as the head of research in Southeast Asia, Linus was instrumental in expanding IDC's presence and influence in the region. His thought leadership is frequently sought after through regular features in various publications and media outlets. He is also a prominent speaker at industry forums, keynote events, and strategy workshops. Before joining IDC, Linus worked with a leading outsourcing service provider with a digital banking focus. He holds a Master of Science degree from the University of Lincoln, United Kingdom.

There is no doubt that we live in the age of video. IDC research shows a 32% increase in video usage since the start of the pandemic. Whether it’s watching YouTube clips to research a product or service, attending B2B meetings and events live online, or watching news reels on Instagram, the use of this medium has grown in all areas of communication. Other than a live personal interaction, nothing tells a story, communicates, informs, or entertains better than video.  

“Every industry has the opportunity to use video to educate, persuade, and communicate with its customers. Defining and implementing a cohesive content strategy can be a game changer in how an organization connects with its employees and customers in a more engaging and immersive manner.” (Marci Maddox, research vice president, IDC Digital Experience Strategies) 

All generations and demographics prefer to interact with video and other rich media over any other content.  While in the past consumers would look at online reviews, read blog posts, or watch commercials, now they are relying more heavily on this type of content in their research phase.  

B2B customers use video for many professional reasons. 

Which of the following types of technology-related video content are you likely to watch for business purposes? 

Source: Foundry Role & Influencer of the Technology Decision-Maker Survey, 2022 

Lights! Camera! Leads? 

A recent study from Wyzowl found that 86% of businesses use video as a marketing tool. But does this mean that they all make a significant impact? Can you even remember the last marketing video that really impressed you and made you act?  

Most marketing videos are light on information and heavy on repetition. You can and should do better, as a well-planned video can create a powerful, lasting impact, create brand awareness, and ultimately leads.  

You are ready to invest in video. Read on to learn how to create a video that really delivers results.

The Makings of a Great Video 

You might want to delve straight into pre-production, but have you thought about the reason you want to use video and who it will address? What’s the story you are telling, how do you want to tell it, and who do you tell it to? And, most importantly, will it satisfy your audience’s needs and pain points? Only then you can decide on what video format, if any, you want to use.  

Also, remember to make the video timely as well as respectful of other people’s time. Don’t waste your time with lengthy introductions. Instead, get straight to the point.  

Finally, what’s the rationale behind the video? How does it fit into your overall content strategy? What’s the messaging? Where will you promote it? Is it part of a series? 

To sum it up: Remember the three Rs – reason, respect, and rationale – before you even start pre-production. This will save you time as well as money in the longer run. 

5 Steps to Successful Video Marketing 

Define the audience 

Knowing who you market to is the key to a successful campaign. Use reliable data to identify your target audience and create personas to express clearly who you have in mind when creating your content. 

Set a timeline and budget 

Even though we are not about talking Hollywood-like productions, the creation of video content can be time-consuming and expensive. That’s why it’s important to create a clear timeline for every step of the process and plan for occasional delays. Even a small production relies on the skills of many different people, so using basic project management tools will save you time and money. 

Choose the best hosting platform  

Before creating your video, think about where you will be hosting it and research platform-specific requirements. You will want to consider what people on each platform are looking for. Also, take into consideration that a video doesn’t promote itself. You will have to put in some time and effort to make sure your video gets seen by the right people.  

Develop messaging and choose the right type of video 

Your message should always be tailored to both personas and the platform. For example, longer formats work well on YouTube, while other social media channels like Instagram prefer short-form content. 

Decide which metrics you will track and what success looks like 

Before you start production, you must be clear about what success will look like. The best place to find out which metrics to use is to define the video’s place in the marketing funnel.  

For example, if you address the top of the funnel, and your aim is to introduce your brand to potential customers, your KPIs will be related to the discovery of the brand, not sales. Examples of this are total views, view duration, or 3-second views.  

If you are looking to deepen the relationship with potential customers mid-funnel and create consideration content, you will be looking at metrics like click-through rates or view length.  

Only at the conversion stage at the bottom of the funnel, your KPIs should be related to sales outcomes.  

Interested in learning more? Download IDC’s Tech Marketer’s Guide to Video Marketing today. 

Beyond high availability and disaster recovery, cloud infrastructure provides the capital markets with scalability and versatility that standalone organizations would typically struggle to replicate with traditional computing, networking, and storage solutions. These attributes of scalability and versatility are foundational to sustained real-time connectivity and interoperability needed for open and resilient capital markets. The resiliency of the capital markets rests on their capacity to sustain internal and external stressors while meaningfully adapting to new operating parameters, from the economic to the regulatory and everything in between. Cloud infrastructure is an excellent means of strengthening the capital markets’ adaptive capacity.

What’s next for the capital markets and cloud services?

Industry ecosystem collaboration around shared cloud native utilities is an essential next step toward maximizing the benefits of cloud within the capital markets at scale. Narrow, use case-specific cloud initiatives have demonstrated, replicable outcomes for institution-specific processes. Growing product and service commodification within the markets is making the broad adoption of shared utilities and business-process-as-a-service (BPaaS) offerings an apparent inevitability. This trend towards shared utility platforms is anticipated to be self-reinforcing and perpetuate ongoing industry consolidation.

As firms adopt cloud infrastructure en masse and the capital markets ecosystem embraces public and private shared utility platforms, competition is expected to solidify with a few large firms competing on volume and a raft of smaller firms providing specialized services, or competing in narrow market segments. So, while cloud infrastructure will help cultivate openness and resiliency in the markets that global industries rely on, it will also diminish traditional competitive attributes. Investment in non-differentiated business processes, including those executed on the cloud, will increasingly fail to provide a defensible competitive positioning.

How can capital markets firms differentiate themselves considering these potential outcomes?

A great first step is to identify and eliminate technical debt in the process of comprehensively leveraging cloud infrastructure elements towards a digital-first business model. Next, firms might consider how mutualized industry infrastructure is going to change the value of their competitive differentiators. Are the profits stemming from superior speed to market sustainable or will technology have eliminated informational asymmetries and associated profits? Are the industry channel partners going to be around in five years to provide deal flow or will access have been democratized by a variety of agile new market entrants? For those firms unable to consolidate deal or order flow and operate profitability across commoditized product and service classes, the answer may lie in how they can generate and monetize data. Presumably, there will always be a marginal competitive benefit in customizing technologies like cloud services faster or better than the competition, but ultimate differentiation will likely originate from firms’ capacity to generate or acquire and then either sell or act upon quality data.

As discussed, cloud architecture lends well to shared industry utilities and is generative to openness and resiliency which the public and therefore (hopefully!) regulators demand. A natural evolution of this impending market development is the adoption of distributed ledger technologies (DLT). DLT further enhances the openness and resiliency cloud architecture provides by introducing an immutable quality of transparency. The trusted capital markets ecosystem model of tomorrow rests on the successful co-adoption of these technologies. Firms and technology vendors in the space are encouraged to think critically about their current business models as tomorrow’s market structure is expected to exhibit markedly different competitive dynamics.

To learn more about the ways in which technologies like cloud are expected to affect the capital markets, click the button below to access IDC’s new eBook, Planned Adoption of Private Cloud within the Capital Markets.

Thomas Shuster - Research Director - IDC

Thomas Shuster is Research Director for IDC Financial Insights responsible for the Worldwide Capital Markets, Wealth, and Digital Asset Strategies program. Mr. Shuster's core research coverage includes the transformation of the capital markets industry, particularly sell-side investment banking, and the use of technologies to modernize and leverage opportunities in the market. Previously, Mr. Shuster was Vice President of Sales with Alpha Ledger Technologies, a digital asset origination platform startup, where he advised the founding team on capital markets processes, financial technology product development, and go-to-market strategy. Prior to Alpha Ledger, Mr. Shuster led new deal origination as Director of Business Development at Charter Asset Management. Earlier, Mr. Shuster was a Director, Investment Banking with UBS Financial Services where he originated underwriting business, a Vice President with Blue Rose Capital Advisors where he advised clients on capital markets access, and a Financial Research Analyst with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) where he structured sovereign debt arrangements during the 2007-2009 Great Recession. - B.S. in International Business from Northeastern University

5G, IoT and Edge Driving Telcos to Embrace Platform Architectures

The overarching theme in the telecoms marketplace is that the rise of 5G, IoT and edge is driving telcos to consider new platform architectures and ecosystems to deliver the right solutions for their customers. Telcos are searching for more intelligent ways to monetise their network data and to create value beyond connectivity as we surge towards an increasingly connected world.

Increasing connectedness also increases the amount of data that telcos must support. IDC’s Global DataSphere Forecast projects that data created and consumed will grow at a rate of 26% through 2024, topping 142EB.

To support the vast increase in data, and to successfully monetise adjacent services, telcos must embrace intelligent automation, containerised architectures and cloud-native principles to modernise and simplify operations for business agility and faster time to market. This will be facilitated through cloud platform solutions that can scale in line with continuously changing market demands and requirements, and which necessitate a new class of digital ecosystem partnerships.

Driving Revenue Growth Through Programmable Networks

Telcos globally are at different stages on their journeys to becoming cloud native. Some are aggressively pursuing a public-cloud-first strategy while others are taking cautious steps away from on-premises by having a hybrid cloud focus.

Most telcos are taking a pragmatic approach and have begun their migration from legacy and network functions virtualisation (NFV) platforms to container-based, cloud-native platforms. These shifts are driven by the lower cost of ownership and elastic scaling of the network.

Cloud-native network functions (CNFs) are being progressively deployed alongside virtual network functions (VNFs) so that customer-centric services can be scaled, updated and orchestrated more easily. However, the vast majority of telco cloud workloads still leverage VNFs and we expect the overall spending on telco cloud software to grow from $7.5 billion in 2020 to $29.0 billion in 2025 at a CAGR of 30.9%.

Cloud and the convergence of compute, storage, networking and edge will enable CSPs and enterprises to offer their customers completely reimagined user experiences. The openness and programmability of telco cloud will also give rise to further industry collaboration — Vodafone teamed up with AWS in 2021 to launch Europe’s first public multi-access edge computing (MEC) deployment providing a platform for applications developers to deliver low-latency use cases leveraging the full breadth of AWS cloud services, right at the edge of 5G networks.

This enabled AWS Wavelength customers to explore new business opportunities, build applications and services that were not possible before, and transform user experiences. Unlocking 5G revenues will also depend on a major shift towards adaptable operations and monetisation systems.

Across EMEA, particularly in Europe, partnerships between telcos and public cloud providers to support OSS/BSS deployments continue to strengthen as operators seek to implement deep digital transformations to drive revenue growth. Examples in the first half of 2022 include Vodafone’s deal with Oracle in June 2022 to migrate many of its IT systems to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, and BT’s five-year deal with AWS announced in May 2022 as the telco seeks to modernise its IT infrastructure.

Three Emerging Business Models for Telco Cloud

The relationships between telcos and their cloud/technology partners are complicated and still evolving. CSPs are still refining their own network transformation and road maps, while having to decide between using their own private network cloud solutions versus working with public cloud providers.

We have seen the formation of three business models between the CSPs and cloud providers:

  • Outsourcing back-office and IT functions: CSPs runs back-office operations like billing, service management and customer relationship management in a public cloud environment.
  • Enabling service channels, partnerships and application creation: The telco and cloud providers work together to deliver end-user services (sell-with model), mainly to enterprise customers.
  • Migrating network workloads: This involves shifting the core, RAN and other essential networking components of the telco to the cloud.

Of the three business models, telcos using cloud to host network workloads is the newest and the riskiest. This model received mainstream attention when AT&T announced it would use Microsoft Azure to host its mobile core network.

The purpose of this action is to enable the migration of AT&T’s 5G core workloads to Azure as AT&T continues its transformation into a cloud-native 5G mobile operator. AT&T is not the first mobile operator to do this — DISH had already announced plans to work with AWS to host its network functions.

The difference here is that AT&T has an established network with traffic and DISH is a greenfield network operator. Outsourcing a core network competency requires significant trust and confidence between the telco and cloud provider as any notable disruption or interference could negatively impact operations and cause outages, seriously harming the business reputation of the telco.

To provide relevant 5G solutions to the market and drive revenue growth, telcos must go beyond connectivity and focus on delivering outcomes. The deployment of 5G core will further anchor the importance of having a cloud platform solution in place since the standard defines a service-based architecture (SBA) and implements IT network principles with a cloud-native design approach.

These deployments were ongoing in 2020 and will continue into 2022 and beyond.

What’s Next for European Telcos

Telcos are increasingly embracing disaggregated, cloud-native architectures as part of their next-generation network deployments — mixing bare metal, Kubernetes containers and IaaS solutions.

Our 2022 IDC Telco Transformation Survey listed cloud and cloudification as a top transformation activity to implement for CSPs on their journey to becoming DSPs, and we are witnessing telcos adopting new methodologies, practices and tools to underpin their cloud-orientated digital strategies. These strategies also depend on what they deem as best in class to meet their expectations.

This will require a complex web of alliances and partners ranging from legacy vendors to hyperscale cloud providers to other software vendors. While there are challenges to overcome, there are many technological, commercial and strategic advantages to be gained.

IDC’s Telco Digital Summit, on November 22, will look at these themes in more detail. The summit will feature Europe’s leading telco analysts and senior telco executives and will include keynotes from industry leaders to help attendees chart a path through the storms in the European telco market.

This is the second blog in IDC’s Telco Digital Summit Series. The first blog — How Telcos Are Transforming in Europe: Technology, Services and Customers — is available here.

Have you noticed how often we reference maps, floor plans or other location and geospatial tools in our everyday lives? Did you monitor the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 map early in the pandemic? Look at photos of the Ever Given ship trapped in the Suez Canal and try to figure out if that was going to impact your supply chain? Start anticipating your delivery when Door Dash showed you your driver’s progress?

No matter what industry you are in, it is time to make location and geospatial intelligence a part of your enterprise strategy so that you can realize the benefits there too. IDC has a growing body of research to show how this capability adds value to software and to the enterprise overall.

Are you capturing ‘place’ with any of your current enterprise sensors and software?

Everything that happens in your enterprise happens somewhere. Whether it is a worker at a certain spot in a manufacturing facility or a data center where you are storing data or an address where a customer’s order is supposed to arrive, that physical context of where the action takes place impacts the action. Any type of IoT sensor is ripe to be analyzed by its placement, and could be analyzed against other factors of that immediate environment such as weather, air quality, or the number of other devices nearby. Maybe you just want to check that physical assets are where they are supposed to be. Your asset inventory probably specifies where each item is, but there’s a lot you can do beyond just basic tracking of whether an asset is in its correct position.

Recent IDC research on data buyers showed that 74% are using location data today, whether they source it internally or externally. Across every industry we studied, at least 25% of enterprises are using more location data than they did just 1-3 years ago. The usage by those in transportation and logistics has soared by nearly 60%; while finance and retail/wholesale upped their already-leading usage of this data type by nearly 50%.

Not every analytical package, developer tool or even database can handle the varied types of location and geospatial data that exist. In order to turn this data into insight, you need fit for purpose tools that can assist with data preparation functions such as geocoding, normalizing and cleansing what can be massive datasets. More and more database vendors are including geospatially compatible structures at no additional cost, even if many of their users are not taking advantage of those features.

Are you using enterprise SaaS that has location and/or geospatial capability?

Business process enterprise SaaS has not incorporated location and/or geospatial capabilities to the extent that some database tools have to date. This is likely to be on the horizon though because recent IDC research shows that 76% of SaaS buyers would be willing to pay more for applications that include location and/or geospatial capability. That is huge – and a greater percentage than would be willing to pay extra for almost any possible add-on capability.

There wasn’t huge variance across enterprise applications either. While subscription management was the highest at 86%, the least appealing offer would be with Talent Management, and 73% of SaaS users were willing to pay more for additional location capabilities in that application.

In another study, 40% of external data buyers said that they were sourcing location data from within their enterprise applications. Clearly, there is a lot of draw for enterprise applications that are making use of location and geospatial points to enhance the value to their users.

This doesn’t even touch upon the use of a variety of spatial analytic and data science applications that you may be able to deploy. From traditional GIS (that is moving to the cloud) to open source tools to no-code and low-code platforms, the market has been exploding with new offerings and extended capabilities from more mature vendors. However, the efforts to equip more data scientists and data analysts with spatial skills (and have historical GIS departments partner with a broader range of business functions) have been slow to gain traction.

Are you missing out on opportunities to glean better insight into your processes and assets?

This is a bit of a rhetorical question, since I firmly believe that the context of where something is happening (or should happen, or might happen) unlocks greater value by unlocking meaning that hadn’t been taken into consideration previously. We are finding that enterprises with even a low level of geospatial capability improve their performance across a wide spectrum of metrics – and those at the top of the geospatial maturity scale have a 50% greater benefit. The areas these enterprises can improve are quite diverse, from things that are fairly obvious like managing facilities and routing deliveries, to less expected areas such as developing business plans and pursuing new markets. As just one example, indoor space planning has become much more sophisticated with BIM integration, indoor wayfinding, and applications that helped to register and monitor how space was being used under pandemic restrictions and for ongoing benefits.

Can you really make the best possible decisions and have keen insight to your processes and assets without considering WHERE they are?

As I’ve written elsewhere, I believe that using ‘place’ as a context in business processes and analytics is going to become as commonplace as using ‘time.’ While it is true that your use cases might drive you to new technologies, analytical tools and new people and skills for your organization, adding (or fortifying) location and geospatial as part of your data strategy is an investment that will not take long to pay off.

Want to chat about how you have been using – or getting ready to use – location and geospatial dimensions in your data and applications?

Lynne Schneider - Research Director - IDC

Lynne Schneider is Research Director leading IDC's Data Collaboration & Monetization, and Location & Geospatial Intelligence market research and advisory practices. Ms. Schneider's core research coverage in DaaS includes data sourcing and delivery services from traditional and emerging data providers along with evolving data aggregation and dissemination platforms. The breadth of coverage includes services that enable an organization to externally monetize data generated as part of the organization's ongoing operations, value-added information derived from this data, and the marketplace for combining data with other solutions. This research analyzes the supply and demand side business and technology trends of this emerging category.

We recently had our Advisory Board meeting, comprised of senior executives from European manufacturing organisations, with an objective to understand the latest topics or challenges they are dealing with. The two main challenges that were on their lists were energy prices and cybersecurity, how these two converge, and the role that technology can play to overcome the obstacles created by these threats.

Exploding Energy Prices

Unsurprisingly, the first challenge is exploding energy prices and how most manufacturers are struggling to cope with the ongoing situation here in Europe. They are in firefighting mode and find it extremely challenging to make profits from their operations.

Many companies have had to completely stop production for a few weeks, and this will continue even more in the coming months as prices rise exponentially. Some European manufacturers that have recently announced shutdowns are Arcelor Mittal (Germany), Aperam (Belgium), and CF Industries (United Kingdom).

Manufacturers tend to get energy price visibility only a week ahead and are therefore unable to plan for longer. Unless these costs can be passed on to customers, they have an impact on everything else and are pushing manufacturers beyond limits.

The cost uncertainty significantly complicates the S&OP process. For instance, frozen food requires storage in cold conditions and soaring energy prices lead to planning constraints. The bigger challenge is that this doesn’t seem to be going to stabilise anytime soon.

Are such high prices now the new normal? It is getting complex, since absorbing the costs or keeping high safety stock is making it difficult for manufacturers to even stay afloat.

Cybersecurity

There has been a shift from traditional closed systems to interconnected and open ones as part of digital transformation in manufacturing. This has made the industrial internet environment extremely complex, leaving the internet with many weaknesses and attracting more and more criminal attacks.

These cyberattacks have risen massively in the past six months. The manufacturing industry is only now waking up to the need for and importance of cyber security.

Most manufacturing organisations are increasing their investments in cybersecurity, but this is also leading to limitations in their operational technology (OT). They have mentioned how some of these cybersecurity measures had to be disabled because they impacted the performance of their equipment.

The desired output wasn’t being achieved, which required decision-making between a secure environment and the performance of the equipment.

When cyberattacks are successfully made on the systems or equipment that produce gas, it leads to a production shutdown causing an energy war. Unfortunately, this is the current reality that manufacturers are dealing with.

Producers acknowledge supply chain struggles caused by the pandemic, but these attacks on energy-producing equipment are hitting them at their core. The situation is making them rethink their IT capabilities — what to continue to do in-house vs. what to outsource/partner with and with whom.

The most important thing in such times is to be resilient, but the question is how? How to have safe energy, smarter supply chains, optimised and secure systems, visibility into what is happening and what needs to be done?

This is where technology can play a key role and manufacturers are looking for technology partners, not just to help them solve these challenges but also to build long-term resilience, especially around energy and materials. These challenges also provide an opportunity to think differently, innovate, and explore different business models, and only those manufacturers that can sail through this challenging phase will stay relevant in the market.

IDC the European Manufacturing Summit

Join us on November 15 at IDC’s European Manufacturing Digital Summit as it will be a perfect opportunity for manufacturing executives to discuss further on these challenges, share lessons learned, and network with the peer group.

Our advisory board members are keen to hear from technology providers during our summit about how they are helping solve these challenges. A summary of previous discussions with our Advisory Board can be found here. The summit also provides an opportunity for manufacturing organisations and technology providers to discuss how they can thrive in an increasingly digital and sustainable but also uncertain, volatile, and complex economy.

IT executives and senior decision makers can register here for the summit.

For more information about the summit, please contact Stefanie Naujoks or Gunjan Bassi, or head over to https://www.idc.com/eu

Gunjan Bassi - Research Manager - IDC

Gunjan Bassi has more than 14 years' experience working in the logistics and transportation sector. Before joining IDC, she worked with Transport Intelligence (Ti), a transportation and logistics research firm based in Bath, England, where she was responsible for vertical sector research covering qualitative and quantitative reports. She was also actively involved in the development of new research capabilities and product features of Ti's flagship market intelligence portal. Previously, based in India, she was leading the global logistics research team at Evalueserve where she was responsible for running custom research projects commissioned by leading logistics service providers (LSPs) and focussed on strategy/GTM, sales enablement, and market and competitive intelligence. Bassi holds a bachelor's degree from Shri Ram College of Commerce (SRCC), Delhi University, and post-grad studies in management.

Agile development promises faster, more responsive development. This aligns better with the transformation of organizations, as they face heightened, more competitive environments. Driven by market and technology changes, organizations are re-structuring themselves and their products and services to be more Agile and opportunistic to market changes. Agile should be suited to delivering this responsiveness when building and supplying technology capabilities to transforming organizations. 

But, frequently, it isn’t. 

By its nature, Agile can and should be a major enabler supporting these changes, but many organizations find it difficult to manage and extract this value. This is due to the challenges in measuring productivity, quality, performance, and forecasting delivery. It’s hard to manage what can’t easily be measured. 

Why is Agile Hard to Measure and Harvest Value From? 

Waterfall and other goal- or milestone-focused development methodologies are structured with clear definitions of project phases (requirements gathering, sequential development, codified dev-test-QA-production flows) and milestones. Agile is more fluid. Agile measures productivity in terms of qualitative measurement, Story Points, that make cross-team productivity comparisons difficult. Agile value is based on individuals and interactions getting it done over process. It drives to create working code (moving quickly) while back-seating documentation. By working closely with the customer in the development process, it is more responsive and adaptable at the risk of increasing backlog, and expanding scope and requirements. 

While Agile is well suited for delivering capabilities in a modern, competitive landscape, getting that value is hard, but not impossible. Typically, organizations struggle in three areas of Agile value:

  • Predictable delivery of capabilities (reliable productivity)
  • Quality
  • Cost to performance, including with service providers

IDC Metri’s Agile Value Management product addresses these management challenges by assessing agile development efforts across team and product performance categories. Key team factors assessed are productivity, cost efficiency, delivery speed, and quality. For product quality, we evaluate robustness, efficiency, security, changeability, transferability, and technical debt. Future, it allows for benchmarking team performance against other teams within an organization and against market peers. These assessments filter up into management dashboards, to help identify trends, and engineering dashboards that drill into specific recommendations and remediation. 

Predictable Delivery of Capabilities

With the Agile framework being structured around sprints (typically two-week cycles of refactoring, back-log attack, development, and just-in-time requirements gathering), Story Points for goals, and velocity (Story Point clearing) for progress, it’s hard for organizations to translate these measures to more traditional measures of progress. A lot of motion and momentum is demonstrated, but how this leads to predictable delivery of capabilities is elusive. To address this, IDC Metri uses a proven methodology for assessing progress and ensuring predictability—automated and enhanced function point analysis (FPA).  

The IDC Metri Agile Value Management (AVM) solution assess a development team’s progress using both enhance and automated function point analysis. FPA delivers a concrete assessment of size delivered (value) and enables comparison of productivity across teams and benchmarking against industry peers. AVM provides management with the progress measurement dashboards for productivity and delivery speed. To measure and assess these, IDC Metri uses the functional output a team has delivered in a certain timeframe, leveraging the NESMA standard of functional size added + changed + deleted. In the case of automatic measurement of functional size, IDC Metri measures according to the ISO 19515 standards of Automated Function Points (AFP), and Enhancement Function Points (EFP). This data is presented in a fashion that allows managers to understand progress to goals and transparency to understand and predict capability delivery.

Quality

Ensuring predictable, or efficient development, only matters if the product being produced is of the quality (stability, security, efficiency, etc.) necessary to meet the business goals. For this reason, it is important to balance performance measures of the team with quality measures of the code. We don’t want measures and goals for performance to have the unintended consequence of driving down quality. 

AVM provides source code analysis. This analysis provides ongoing assessment and trends in team quality over time and highlighting key areas of deficit. With this analysis, an Engineering dashboard is created showing the (critical) violations found, why these are violations, where they are found and how to solve them. The most critical ones are put on an action plan. This data is also presented in easily digestible fashion for managers responsible for managing and ensuring product quality. 

The Engineering dashboards clearly identifies poor code and critical violations (CVEs) allowing the development team to better, and more rapidly, address quality issues. When adopting the guidance from the Engineering dashboard, overall development team practices improve. Quality and performance enhances, due to lower testing efforts, resulting from enhanced coding practices. Also, improving practices and identifying better practices reduces team stress and enables recently onboarded team members to become more rapidly productive.

Cost to Performance

Sourced Agile development projects are typically time and materials (T&M), which shifts budget risk from the sourcing vendor to the buyer. Previously, development projects were typically fixed prices where risk (especially financial) was weighted towards the sourcing vendor. Similarly, even with internal projects, budgeting and cost were more predictable, due to the structure and predictable nature of methodologies like Waterfall. 

AVM, by putting measurable, traceable and consistent metrics around development, helps make cost management and cost efficiency easier and transparent. Also, by providing benchmarking within an organization and against peers, a client has the context to understand the competitive meaning of these assessments (i.e., is my team underperforming in my industry in the cost/performance ratio for development?). Further, by assessing sourcing vendor current performance versus cost, goals can be set and measured consistently, over time, for assessment. AVM, with its combination of market benchmarking for services and concrete performance metrics, benchmarks the sourcing vendor performance against market peers. This enables buyers to determine whether the service capabilities they procured are delivered competitively to other vendors in the market. Furthermore, it gives leverage to the buyer in ensuring that a T&M development contract is performing at a minimum to market peers, i.e., that the buyer is not over-paying for the quality and productivity of the development they receive. 

Supplier Improvement Actions

A client example illustrates this. The client company nearshored application development and maintenance. They were concerned they were paying more than the value they received. IDC Metri performed an AVM assessment demonstrating gaps in value based on the hours (cost) put into the sprints. Productivity was 30% lower and cost 22% higher than market average. Maintenance cost four times the market average. This assessment culminated in supplier improvement actions to comply with performance and product health metrics (with ongoing verification by IDC Metri). 

To rephrase an earlier observation: if you can’t easily measure something, you can’t easily manage it. AVM allows organizations to clearly understand how their Agile development teams (staff or sourced or hybrid) perform and deliver value. It cleanly addresses three key organization struggles around Agile: predictability, quality, and cost. It makes it easy to measure and assess Agile development, which means it enables easier and effective management of Agile. 

Interested in learning more about IDC Metri? Let’s schedule an appointment for an introductory meeting.

The buzzwords frequently used to depict today’s turbulent business landscape—inflation, supply chain woes, recession, rising energy costs and political unrest—paint a cautionary picture for all businesses around the world.  But for small and medium-sized companies, today’s rocky business terrain is particularly concerning.  

Many SMBs do not have a deep well of reserves to sustain their businesses for years during tough economic times. And that makes it critical for them to apply technology smartly and zero in on efficiency, cost savings, productivity and automation—and fast—to weather today’s economic storms.

But what are SMBs grappling with, specifically, from the long list macroeconomic woes circling the globe today? The answer, IDC finds, depends on where an SMB resides. New IDC research into the macroeconomic challenges of SMBs across the globe, unveiled through our BuyerView Cloud Pulse program, illustrates that while SMBs worldwide are dealing with intensified macroeconomic issues, the specific concerns vary greatly by region.

The research is based on a May survey of IT decision makers, developers and line of business cloud influencers at companies that had already, or are planning in the near future, to adopt cloud technologies. Respondents had to prove familiarity of cloud infrastructure and applications and be familiar with their organization’s cloud strategy.  More than half of all respondents—742—were small- to medium-sized businesses with 1-999 employees.

The survey findings show that APAC SMBs are highly concerned about economics such as inflation, exchange rates and low economic growth. North American and European SMBs, meanwhile, rank energy costs as top concerns. Supply chain concerns rank high in North America. While SMBs in Europe and APAC note that the conflict in Ukraine is causing more business and IT supply chain disruptions. And, SMBs in the U.S. and APAC are more likely to be impacted by their customers losing business/sales than SMBs in Western Europe.

Our study also evaluated the impact of COVID-19 across global SMBs and found that while COVID is still impacting SMBs worldwide, the COVID impact is 20 percentage points greater in APAC than other regions as lock-downs prompted APAC SMBs to consider new ways of reaching customers and carrying out work.

By size, smaller SMBs say supply chain issues are leading to a lack of IT equipment/materials. This is likely because the smallest SMBs use fewer cloud technologies and rely on more basic and physical IT, such as laptops, mobile devices, printers and servers. Therefore, the material and hardware shortages are impacting them directly.

SMBs on the larger end report that supply chain disruptions are extending the time it takes to complete IT projects. Larger SMBs are likely using a mix of cloud and on-premise/in-house IT and are suffering directly from supply chain issues, including higher costs and longer delivery times for hardware. But many are also impacted indirectly as major cloud suppliers pass on increased data center energy, hardware component and employee costs to them. A common global thread across all SMBs is inflation. Two-thirds of global SMBs report that they are currently impacted in some way by inflation.

When we asked about the technology improvements and enhancements SMBs made in the 12 months leading up to Q1 of 2022 to boost resiliency, the results showed SMBs lag behind their enterprise counterparts. SMBs ranked behind enterprise businesses in eight of 12 areas where we asked about investments to improve business resiliency. One caveat: a greater percentage of SMBs invested in ecommerce capabilities than enterprise companies, suggesting SMBs are working to meet the wants and needs of today’s more digitally savvy consumers—a trend induced by COVID, and one that we believe is here to stay.

So how can tech suppliers connect with and sell to leery SMBs hamstrung by a range of macroeconomic challenges? They must communicate that now is the time — a time when many SMBs aren’t clamoring for air to keep up with staggering growth — for them to stop and rethink their approach to technologies and boost business resiliency. SMBs should take this unique time to pause and investigate the wide array of technology offerings on the market that can help them be more efficient and productive.

SMBs need to boost resiliency and to move to technologies that will power their businesses for growth — before they get so large that change becomes highly complex, and before they become entrenched with legacy systems and processes that are difficult to replace. The SMBs that take these steps now will weather today’s economic storms—and continue to grow once they pass.

I encourage you to read our research covering macroeconomic challenges at global SMBs. It’s a topic we will monitor closely as the business landscape and headwinds continue to evolve. 

Katie Evans - Sr. Director, Research - IDC

Katie Evans, Senior Director, Worldwide Small Medium Business (SMB) Research Program within the Digital Transformation space. Katie's core research coverage includes identifying and supporting the unique, evolving needs of the Very Small, Small and Medium Business technology buyer. Katie has a strong, SMB-focused research and writing background, having covered SMBs in the retail and ecommerce space for over 12 years. Most recently, her primary coverage area was researching the technology needs of SMB retailers and analyzing the vendor offerings on the market to meet those evolving needs. Katie has also conducted extensive writing and research on mobile and international ecommerce and has authored several custom reports for vendors serving SMBs.

Connectivity is a defining feature of the modern digital economy. The increasing ubiquity of mobile and fixed connectivity has enabled new digital economic models and these had already become part of people’s daily lives before the COVID-19 pandemic made digital interactions unavoidable.

Ubiquity and regular use have turned connectivity into a vital commodity which, paradoxically, telcos find difficult to grow revenues from. This commoditisation has steadily shrunk the value of telco shares over the past five years.

This is driving an industrywide imperative to change as Europe’s multibillion-dollar telecoms market seeks to embrace new technologies (cloud, AI, 5G), new ways of working (agile and DevOps) and new revenue opportunities (B2B and B2B2C). These trends play out against a backdrop of war in Ukraine, high inflation, a race for talent and an increasing need to show a strong commitment to climate change and social issues.

Technology, Services and Customers

Telcos are eager to reinvent themselves as technology companies that can continue to play a vital role in business and consumer communications. This transformation will need to be deep and will need to be made across dimensions such as technology, services and customers.

Technology

  • Between 2021 and 2026 the amount of data created, captured, replicated or consumed in Europe will increase by over 126%, according to IDC’s latest Global Datasphere forecast. Coupled with regulatory obligations, this piles the pressure on European telcos to continue investing heavily in network capacity upgrades throughout the decade to maintain the performance of their core products.
  • This includes the rollout of 5G access networks and increasing their fibre broadband footprints.
  • Investing in capacity alone will only enable telcos to stand still. To improve the management, creation and experience of their services they must also invest in their core network architecture and supporting IT systems.
  • In IDC’s 2022 digital transformation survey of European telcos, 58% cited BSS investment as the most impactful transformation investment to grow revenues. Other investments include modernising systems to be cloud native, converging core networks to support fixed and mobile services, and developing OSS/BSS platforms that support deeper network monetisation and better customer outcomes.

Services

  • We expect FTTP to account for the majority of broadband lines by 2024 and to represent 58% of total lines by the end of 2025. On the mobile side, European operators are currently rolling out coverage of 5G, which will also require heavy investment.
  • We expect 5G to account for the majority of mobile network connections by 2025, reaching 57% of all mobile connections by the end of that year.
  • As telcos’ core networks and IT systems evolve, operators are also keen to explore new business models that expand their role in consumer and business value chains beyond connectivity. Many of these new business models, from private networks to 5G gaming bundles to network as a service, will require partner-driven ecosystems to supercharge and build extensive value multipliers.
  • As such, 40% of large European operators identified integrating partner services into their ecosystem as a crucial impact of an API-driven strategy in IDC’s European Telco Digital Transformation Survey 2022. For these investments to pay off, telcos need to ensure that the APIs they provide are simple enough for developer partners to use and are supported across heterogenous network infrastructures.

Customers

  • While the bulk of telco revenues has traditionally come from consumer services, the commoditisation of connectivity has made it harder to grow revenues by just selling minutes, texts and data volumes. In 5G, operators are looking to grow their place in the enterprise value chain.
  • This means chasing opportunities such as the 83% of European enterprises that use or plan to use IoT technologies in their operations within the next two years. This shift in customer target cannot be successful without fundamental shifts in how telcos operate and strong insights from trusted partners that understand the B2B and B2B2C customer bases operators intend to create value for.
  • As operators look to acquire new segments, they are also fighting across the board to retain the customers they do have. Over 95% of European telcos are investing in AI/ML, and their main use case is improving customer insight.
  • Building deeper customer insights has a dual purpose — keeping customers happier for longer and helping telcos to identify, develop and productise the new value they offer. Those telcos with the deepest insights will be the most successful in the long term.

What’s Next for European Telcos

Success across all aspects of technology, services and customers requires careful balancing of many transformation initiatives. The competition for the financial and talent investment to succeed across the breadth of initiatives is further complicated by the macroeconomic and geopolitical headwinds blowing through Europe.

The underlying message is that Europe’s telcos can no longer afford to stand still. They must invest and improve across all aspects of their network, operations and organisation if they are to revitalise their space in the broader technology landscape.

IDC’s Telco Digital Summit, on November 22, will look at these themes in more detail. The summit will feature Europe’s leading telco analysts and senior telco executives, and will include keynotes from industry leaders to help attendees chart a path through the storms in the European telco market.

Chris Silberberg - Research Manager, Communication Service Provider Operations and Monetization - IDC

Chris Silberberg is Research Manager for IDC's global Communication Service Provider Operations and Monetization research. Chris' core research coverage includes the evolution of telco monetization, customer experience, orchestration, and assurance capabilities. Telcos are at a crossroads, double down as utility providers or become digital service power houses. Both strategies demand communication service providers fundamentally transform their IT capabilities to enable customer first experiences, autonomous operations, and the capacity to innovate monetization models at scale.

Enterprise medical imaging (EMI) is not just a technology. It’s a set of strategies, initiatives, workflows and solutions implemented enterprisewide to consistently and optimally capture, index, manage, store, distribute, view, exchange, analyse and govern all medical imaging data and content across different settings. It’s there to eliminate traditional imaging silos by aligning imaging technology and infrastructure essentials with universal image availability (without silos).

According to an IDC Health Insights survey in February 2022, 38% of European healthcare providers will invest in a new EMI solution in the next two years and 57% will enhance their current solution. These solutions are likely to be:

  • Cloud based. To support enterprise imaging, healthcare systems are opting for secure, always-on cloud storage to improve the continuum of care and respond to patients’ needs:
    • Easier integration with large hospital electronic healthcare records (EHRs)
    • Faster access to images, reports, results and other vital patient information; a cloud-native image management system can be accessible via a web browser or zero footprint viewer, enabling a single source of patient information; clinicians can also follow patient progress regardless of their location
    • Disaster recovery, with cloud solutions automatically replicating data and enabling complete redundancy and access to information 24 x 7
    • High level of security with data encrypted end-to-end to address patient privacy concerns and limit access to personally identifiable information
  • Supported by intelligent automation technologies. Leaders in the EMI space are focusing on scaling and deepening the use of advanced analytics and AI to support new diagnostic imaging techniques, workflow orchestration, pathway management, rule-based automation of repetitive tasks, reporting, etc., to cater to the specific needs of different clinical use cases, driving evidence-based and precision medicine.
  • Paired with fully managed services. Vendors that provide strategic advice, implementation and support services, tailored to customers and to their business and clinical strategic objectives, are more successful and have better customer retention and customer share. EMI platforms provide a unified environment for data and diagnostic capabilities, but to effectively deploy it, healthcare organisations need to partner with vendors that understand how their medical imaging capabilities are maturing within the organisation’s broader digital strategy. Healthcare providers are also looking for vendors to provide predictive support services to ensure business continuity and dynamically optimise systems.

What’s Driving the EMI Market?

Simply put, it’s the need to navigate away from siloed care and move towards a more integrated care delivery model. In the past few years, healthcare organisations have increasingly relied on their ability to gather, store and analyse massive amounts of data to provide better quality care and operational efficiency. The pandemic has increased the need for imaging and, more importantly, shown that managing complex on-premises infrastructures drastically reduces the agility of already strained IT departments.

As value-based care becomes the norm, healthcare providers are focusing on a data integration strategy to take full advantage of their data. However, this happens only when data, including images, follows the patient throughout the care journey and is easily consumed at the point of care. As healthcare imaging data continues to expand, organisations need technologies that connect data silos and support the entire enterprise.

The Way Forward

To maximise the value of their investments in enterprise imaging, healthcare providers should:

  • Develop an imaging strategy that fits with a “care anywhere” model to ensure the continuum of care to patients
  • Involve healthcare professionals early on and continue to keep them engaged in the implementation and governance of the platform
  • Select an imaging IT vendor that works as a partner to align its value proposition to customers’ goals, as well as constraints, with products and services that offer value for money

To learn more about the EMI market in Europe, please read IDC MarketScape: European Enterprise Medical Imaging 2022 Vendor Assessment or contact Adriana Allocato and Silvia Piai at IDC Health Insights.