At IDC, we have been talking about the micro and macro-economic environment and classifying them as the winds of change. We talk about the headwinds associated with the pandemic, skills shortages and supply chain constraints coming at organizations. What we saw only one year ago, however, is that these headwinds were offset by tailwinds, which we saw as consumer demand, government stimulus and the drive to become a digital business. This is not what we see today.

When the winds of change become storms of disruption

Today, we are faced with record inflation, a tumbling stock market and an economy teetering on the brink of a global recession. These winds of change are coalescing into one big storm of disruption. Given this storm, it is critical for you to think about your planning in three periods, this year.

  1. Near term. Tech vendors need to help your customers slice through the storms of disruption, especially since their traditional IT cost cutting playbook is a lot different in as “as a service economy”.
  1. Mid-term. We believe companies will continue to invest in digital throughout the recession, but there will be a shift in what they invest in as they focus on scaling their digital business.
  2. Long term. We are seeing a fundamental change to the way the global economy is being shaped and the way technology is being used to support the digital economy. It is critical for tech vendors to understand this future and navigate your customers through it.

Near term planning: slicing through the storms of disruption

The big question on everyone’s mind is the economy. The US economy shrank in the first half of the year. However,  we are at a 50-year low for unemployment. But, purchasing power of those wages has decreased as inflation hits a 40-year high.

During this time, we have been tracking enterprise buyer sentiment globally, especially as it relates to IT spending. IDC’s latest global Future Enteprrise Resiliency Survey (FERS) shows 72% of tech buyers and decision makers believe there will be a recession in the coming year; the majority believe the recession is beginning now or will take place in the first half of 2023, with many tech leaders in North America believing we are in a recession right now.

It does not matter whether or not the National Bureau of Economic Research declares a recession, because  the perception of tech buyers becomes our reality. If tech buyers believe a recession is coming, they will act rationally to adjust their tech spending to align with an anticipated drop in revenue.

The extent to which tech buyers decrease their IT spending will depend on how severe they perceive the recession will be. According to IDC’s latest FERS data, 55% of enterprise tech buyers believe there will be a moderate recession that will last 6-9 months. But this sentiment varies by region:

  • North American buyers tend to be most optimistic with one third anticipating a mild recession
  • Asia Pacific buyers tend to be in the middle of road with 60% anticipating a moderate recession
  • Western Europe buyers are most pessimistic with 30% anticipating a severe recession

Based on this current outlook, we have run a downside scenario for Worldwide IT Spending in 2023. In this scenario, IT spending is expected to grow 4% in 2023, compared to our current forecast of 6.3%. Our research shows buyers are not planning to make wholesale cuts across all tech categories. Rather they will be selective about where they cut.

We believe previous recession playbooks will not be as effective as technology increasingly becomes sold and delivered “as a service” and used to drive digital business models.

In the past, the playbook consisted of 3 key maneuvers:

  1. Delay capital expenditures by extended PC and infrastructure upgrades
  2. Cut labor costs, especially contract staff
  3. Delay the launch of new IT projects by a year

Why won’t these maneuvers have the same impact in an “as a service” and digital economy?

  1. While enterprise will delay capital expenditures, it will not have as much of an impact as more of the IT budget is made up of operating expenses via “as a service” contracts. In fact, a recession could drive organizations towards more OPEX-based infrastructure expenditures sooner than they had planned, as they seek alternatives to potential CAPEX budget cuts.
  2. Organizations are less likely to cut labor as there continues to be a skills shortage, especially around security and digital skills. Our research shows 42% of organizations increased their use of contract labor to address shortages in labor.
  3. Delay the launch of new IT projects by a year. As technology is more closely tied to digital business goals like new revenue streams, organizations will only cut those projects with the lowest business impact. For example, a manufacturer may keep their connected products project because it is tied to 2023 revenue stream. But they may delay a project to experiment with the metaverse in their augmented maintenance program because the business impact is not clearly defined.

What tech suppliers can expect in 2023:

  • Enterprises will increasingly set up and utilize IT FinOps teams to optimize cloud spend. According to our Cloud Pulse survey, 2/3rds of organizations report they are overspending on cloud by 30% or more.
  • They will renegotiate XaaS contracts to embed price certainty. For example, they may negotiate a 4-year contract, as opposed to 3 years, to lock in the price or the price increase.
  • They will eliminate SaaS tools that provide redundant functionality. For example, if they have both Zoom and Teams, they may eliminate one.
  • They will reprioritize their open projects with the lens of short-term business impact.

Don’t miss similar blogs, where we discuss the recession on tech markets, planning and how to scale digital business.

Related Reading:

  • Technology Strategy Research and Insights: Ms. Whalen’s international team of 1,100 analysts leverage research and advisory services to empower business transformation for the Global 2000, and counsel technology suppliers on creating effective offerings for the digital economy. Meredith Whalen (idc.com)

  • IDC’s Guide to market sizing in an overheated economy:  Download our free guide to help you build a resilient strategic plan that helps you respond faster to change.  

Meredith Whalen - Chief Research Officer - IDC

As IDC's Chief Product, Research & Delivery Officer, Meredith Whalen leads the company's global product, research and data, and delivery organizations. Under her leadership, IDC delivers cutting-edge intelligence to the world's leading technology vendors, enterprises, and investors as they navigate the evolving AI economy. Meredith sets the strategic direction for IDC's global analyst community, shaping research methodologies and agendas that generate industry-leading data and actionable insights to drive high-impact business decisions. With more than 20 years at IDC, Meredith has been a catalyst for some of the company's most transformative initiatives. She founded IDC's Industry Insights and Tech Buyer business units and pioneered the industry's first comprehensive business use case taxonomy. She also led the creation of IDC's DecisionScape methodology-a strategic framework that empowers organizations to better plan, implement, and optimize their technology investments. A recognized thought leader and sought-after speaker, Meredith regularly delivers keynotes at major global technology events and advises senior executives on the trends shaping the future of business and technology. Meredith holds a B.A. with honors from Wellesley College and an MBA with honors from Babson College's F.W. Olin Graduate School of Business.

The energy transition is gaining momentum as utility organizations aim toward net zero emission goals. The power sector has large influence on the energy transition as utilities and power companies continue to build out additional renewable and distributed energy resources energy resources and environmentally clean paths to electrification. Utilities and independent power producers are making significant investments to diversify their energy portfolios, and consequently these investments will force the energy industry as a whole to vastly improve its digital capabilities.

The utilities and power sector produce some of the highest CO2 emissions across the globe. The energy transition: the movement away from fossil fuels and the investment in renewable and cleaner forms of energy, has put utility and power companies under scrutiny, but it has also put these companies in a position to lead in efforts to reduce global CO2 emissions and establish a cleaner future for the energy sector.

Distributed energy resources will play a huge role in the efforts towards net zero emission for the utility sector. The proliferation of distributed energy resources (DERs) globally has spurred investment and research and development (R&D) efforts in creating innovative technologies that can enable utility distribution networks to manage dispersed and cleaner forms of energy in the most optimal and economical manner. Distributed energy resource management systems (DERMSs) are becoming essential software offerings to help manage the power grid.

In addition to the continued growth of utility connected renewable energy resources such as wind and solar farms, utility distribution operators are now being challenged with growing number of customer-owned DERs that can impact their utility footprint such as rooftop solar, battery storage, and electric vehicles. The expansion of DERs along with the environmentally conscious choices electric customers pursue in the ways they consume, produce and, in some cases, sell excess energy back to their utilities to participate in wholesale and distribution-level power markets is changing the traditional centralized utility system model to one that is more complex, customer driven, and decentralized.

Electricity end users and utility customers will be key in advancing the energy transition and further developing the DERMS market. Currently, one of the fastest-growing DERs is rooftop solar. Rooftop solar plus the ability to effectively manage energy storage will be a cornerstone for any DERMS.

Electricity customers’ participation in the energy transition can be driven by being incentivized to own DERs and participate in clean energy utility programs which can increase the impact on demand response and the increased adoption of electric vehicles which in turn will drive growth and contribute to the inevitable need for DERMSs.

Keep in mind a DERMS is not a one-size-fits-all product. Every utility, distribution system operator, DER owner, operator, and market participant will have their own unique set of needs and circumstances as it relates to distributed energy resource management. Many utilities may be at vastly distinct stages of maturity from a technology and distributed energy resource market penetration standpoint. Utilities will need to understand immediate needs and also be able to forecast and have a vision for future obstacles and challenges in managing DERs. Most DERMS offerings are built to be flexible and can be bought in modules, providing buyers the option to purchase what is needed now and for the near future while having the opportunity to purchase additional modules that may become more important down the line. The trends and evolution of the energy transition, growth in DERs and DERMs will be interesting to track and analyze with the utility and power sector as focal point in the world’s progress toward a cleaner energy future.

For more content that dives into the technologies that are responsible for progressing the world toward a cleaner tomorrow, watch the video, “Energy Insights: Utilities”. Click the button below to watch the video.

John Villali - Sr. Research Director - IDC

John Villali is a Senior Research Director for IDC Energy Insights, primarily responsible for thought leadership in the area of digital strategies for the energy and utilities sector. Villali has an impressive background in power, natural gas and oil markets. Villali's expansive experience within the energy industry allows him to provide superior market insights by having first-hand experience understanding the needs and ambitions of energy industry customers. Villali's areas of expertise and focus of his research include: power, natural gas and oil supply, demand, and fundamental drivers of price, commodity trading risk management, transmission congestion analysis, energy sector digital strategies, demand management and demand response, energy policy, generation, transmission, distribution, asset valuation, asset performance management, energy storage, renewable energy, distributed energy resources and the energy transition. BACKGROUND Villali's skillsets stem from a deep history in the North American power and natural gas markets. That experience has given him the ability to expertly evaluate and communicate the intricate challenges that face the energy industry today. Previous to working at IDC, Villali worked as a Principal Consultant, with a concentration on global wholesale and retail power markets at DNV-GL. Before his time at DNV-GL, he was Head of Americas Power at Thomson Reuters, supporting their Commodities and Energy division. Villali has additionally held senior energy industry roles at other prominent businesses such as: Cambridge Energy Research Associates (now part of S&P Global), RWE Trading Americas, Genscape (now part of Wood Mackenzie), and the Science Applications International Corporation. EDUCATION/INDUSTRY ACCOMPLISHMENTS Some of Villali's energy industry accomplishments include a vast practice and study of wholesale power market fundamentals, integrated electric resource planning, statistical analysis of electric utilities generation output, and the impact of renewable energy and demand-side management (DSM) on global electric power markets. Villali has extensive experience building energy market analytic products for commodity traders. In his time at Thomson Reuters Villali and his team were awarded the Energy Risk's Innovation of the Year for creating and launching a Brazilian wholesale power market trading tool. Villali's educational background includes a Bachelor's Degree in Economics and a minor in Sociology from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

During the summer in Spain religious pilgrims head west for the Camino de Santiago and come November smart city pilgrims head east for the World Smart City Congress in Barcelona. It is the premier global Smart City event held in the city that can arguably claim to have started the movement. 

Last year I wrote a post-event blog likening it to Santa Claus’s Smart City Grotto and expressing concern at the lack of blue-collar solutions. This year I hope I will find:

  • Blue Collar Smart City Solutions. The world is arguably in a more challenging situation than it was last year, with energy probably the greatest concern for the economically vulnerable, and cities are being asked to do more with less funding. Nothing new in that. However, Covid has not gone away, and the majority of local authority spending was already used on social care and health. Cities need to find ways to tackle energy poverty, including changing citizens’ energy behaviour.  I am hoping to see that tech vendors have recognised the outcomes that cities require and are offering solutions for place-based health, behavioural change, mobility, integrated services, and greater data sharing for more targeted assistance.
  • New Partner Ecosystems Between Industry Verticals. It is great to see that there will be elements of the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) companies taking part in this year’s event. After social care and health, the second largest third-party expenditure of local authorities is on the built environment. Last year, the system shock of the pandemic and a recognition of the need to combat climate change gave COP26 the mandate it needed to put ESG and the UN SDGs centre stage.  However, in recent months there has already been an element of stepping back from green initiatives as the energy crisis has risen.

A new ecosystem of stakeholders is required to deliver on the opportunity of sustainable urban development. The built environment ecosystem is a confederation of interests: national and local governments engage AEC firms that in turn are supported by technology, utilities, and energy and telco companies. Between these actors, there is alignment on the need to share data and develop a more people-centric, data powered sustainable urban environment.

The Barcelona World Smart City Congress is an important showcase of what is possible through technology and must continue to be so. Equally, as well as gazing into the future, vendors need to be offering solutions for the immediate challenges faced by cities. Let’s see what Santa has put under the tree.

A global IDC team will be taking part at the Congress, speaking and on panels such as Technology Paving Tomorrow’s Towns , Urban Readiness for Refugee Crises, and Digital Twins to AI-Powered Metaverse Design Platforms.  We have a booth for the three days of the conference, and we would be happy to meet with people to discuss any of the above.

For more information on our coverage of government and the public sector, visit our website.

Digital is the new normal

Today’s world is digital. In our personal lives, we buy digital products, and we consume services through digital channels. Popular entertainment, like movies, television, music, and other media are delivered via online streaming platforms which we seamlessly consume across phones, laptops, and televisions. Physical goods, like groceries, books, toys, computers, and more—things which formerly required us to visit a store to acquire—are now delivered right to our door at the click-of-a-button, or more impressively at the vocal command of a digital assistant.

In our work lives, we produce our value in digital environments, and we manage ourselves with digital tools. Paperless offices are more common than ever, and the market for SaaS and cloud software is forecast for double-digit growth into the foreseeable future, with companies like Microsoft and Salesforce leading the charge. Even in-person and/or analog services (such as training and enablement, consulting, and other professional services) have transformed to offer digital alternatives.

Gain the insight to go-to-market confidently with data

Technology suppliers need accurate market data to help them size and analyze markets, identify and capitalize on sales opportunities, evaluate partnerships and alliances, and hone operational best practices. 

As author and futurist, Geoffrey Moore, puts it: “Without big data analytics, companies are blind and deaf, wandering out onto the web like deer on a freeway.”

Or, to put it another way, without data, tech companies are left to go on gut instinct and intuition to direct critical business decisions; an unenvious position for any technology executive to be in.

Critical applications for data in a tech marketing strategy

While the use cases for data extend well beyond marketing and sales, it’s value can most readily be seen in support of commercial activities. Here are four key areas where data is crucial for business success:

1.       Confident Decision Making

Minimize executive doubt by integrating data into decision-making processes. Prioritize product roadmaps, identify sales targets, generate leads, retain customers, and more with the right data.

Data is logical and intuitive.  When companies have proven facts, they can be confident in the decisions being made for the organization. Data gives the ability to understand the market and pinpoint areas of weakness for the business and helps identify how to adjust as needed.

For instance, when analyzing the best approach for a new entry or further penetration of a market, a tech company must consider how leveraging channel partners can expand their own reach to meet the needs of both the short-head and long-tail. This vast and complex ecosystem may require many partnerships and alliances to effectively serve the market in question and meet growth objectives. Reliable data can help you decide which channel partners to engage, or if merger and acquisition activity makes more sense.

2.       Highly Targeted Marketing

Clients are inundated with marketing coming in all different formats and from many different brands.  Every business is fighting for mindshare. Keep abreast of market trends and stand out from the competition with resonant, data-informed branding and messaging.

It is imperative for a company to be able to market itself as a solution to niche problems and connect with customers on an emotional level using data. The right analytics provides an organization with the information to be a thought leader and helps inspire content that is meaningful to its audience.

When a technology supplier can effectively segment their market into similarly characterized groups of customer targets, they can easily understand the pain points of the customer and how their solution addresses them. This powerful insight translates into impactful value propositions and strong go-to-market messages.

3.       Intelligent Partnerships

Companies today have many underperforming partners that generate significant expenses.  Reveal partnership opportunities not immediately apparent with detailed market data and optimize your strategy with data.

Understand buyer personas and journeys on a new level and address the long-tail market needs with the best possible partners. Quickly find answers to critical questions like what can partners do, where, and with whom?

A common challenge for technology marketers is finding unattached partners before their competitors do. Too many companies spend months going after prospects that in the end provide no value. The right market intelligence can rapidly provide partnership opportunities, revealing insights in minutes that companies would otherwise spend months developing in-house.

4.       Optimized Operations

Become a leaner, more competitive organization with spend and performance benchmarking insights. Invest the right amounts in the right areas to maintain and grow market share while cutting costs to become more profitable.

Data gives tech companies the insights needed to improve efficiency and get more done with less time and resources.  Eliminate and reduce unnecessary processes with data-driven decisions. This not only applies to the product and services offered, but to human resourcing decisions as well.

The use cases for operational efficiencies abound across technology organizations. To just name a few:

  • Sales reps can save time in pursuing partnerships that do not make sense. 
  • Ops managers use data to analyze supply chain issues.
  • Product teams can find the bottlenecks in production to run smoother operations.

Analytics also provides the business models needed to implement intelligently conceived pricing strategies. By using data effectively, tech executives can also understand how a change in cost and services affects customer demand to protect the bottom line.

IDC’s foundation of data and insights covers a breadth of technologies, geographies, and industries to provide clients with the key IT data that is critical for their business. Get the insight to drive success with IDC’s Data & Analytics Solutions.

Related Reading:

Agriculture has always had a data problem. After the invention of writing around 3500BCE, Nisaba, the Sumerian goddess of grain, became the goddess of grain, writing, accounting, and surveying. Like farmers of today, even a goddess of grain had to tackle the problem of on-farm data. The oldest examples of ledgers from around the same period record the inventories and distribution of wheat, barley, and other crops on clay tablets. The invention of writing and accounting was a technological solution to an agricultural problem, one of the first examples of AgTech that has drastically changed the world. Today AgTech has the potential to change our world once again.

Throughout history, most of the food produced was consumed on farm or processed and sold locally in limited quantities. Until the 1930s, the average farmer produced enough food to provide for ten people. In the last century, however, yield per acre has increased exponentially. Today, the average farmer produces enough food to feed over 150 people and is doing so more and more efficiently. Mechanization, advances in agronomy and understanding of genetics have bore fruit (pardon the pun) and much of the progress has come from robust research and development by universities, agribusinesses, and farmers. This massive increase has been known as the green revolution. Ultimately, this progress has been achieved through the harvesting of raw data around crop yield, quality, and economics to inform best practices on the farm.

Economically, this increase in production has not translated to an increase in value for raw food. The main increase in value from agriculture production from the Green Revolution has been by the value-added supply system. Most food enters a complicated global supply chain. Raw foods are gathered, cleaned, stored, sorted, shipped, blended, processed, combined with other ingredients to produce a bevy of products that are transported to waiting consumers adding magnitudes more commercial value than the raw food had in its local market. Wheat left to spoil in a field has no value compared to raw wheat stored in a silo, but bread is ten to one hundred times more valuable than siloed wheat. Furthermore, wheat left uncleaned in bins will inevitably loose value over time or it may spoil and become useless. We are seeing similar trends with on farm data.

Over the last several decades we have entered the next agriculture revolution, Agriculture 4.0. Farmers have increased the amount of data being harvested from the fields along with their crops and many understand that this data has value. The average farmer generates 500,000 data points every day but not all of this is valuable. Data collected ranges from satellite data to equipment sensors readings to handwritten notes. By 2036, the amount of data collected daily is expected to increase by 800 percent, a growth driven largely by the proliferation of sensors and other connected technologies. Just as there are different qualities of crops harvested, there are different qualities of data collected and data quality determines value. Often, the process of analyzing this information is too cumbersome for the average farm, meaning most data is either not collected, goes unused sitting in data silos losing value, ultimately spoiling or is simply wasted. Similar to wheat unharvested in a field, data that is not recorded has no value whereas siloed data will only depreciate in value compared to data connected to a supply network. Dissimilar to wheat, raw data coming from the farm does not have a robust market to enter, but this is beginning to change.

Traditionally, information gathered on farm was either used to improve processes leading to greater yield or to bolster certification claims (e.g. Certified Organic), adding value to the physical product itself. As more information is associated with the physical product, the value of those products increases, allowing farmers to distinguish their product and target premium markets. For those higher up the value-added chain, more data can allow processors to match variability in crop quality caused by genetics and growing conditions to their facilities processes, thereby optimizing their returns. We can see this process continuing the length of the value chain, with AgTech firms collecting data and passing it from the farm gate to the end consumer. This allows retailers to back marketing claims (helping to avoid or defend against lawsuits), matching products to customers needs (or values), and building consumer loyalty. More vertically integrated industries such as pigs and poultry are realizing that circular sharing of this information can rapidly increase efficiency, productivity, and value. Information collected throughout the production system in pigs can help products enter specialty markets, reduce the size of recalls, match feeding practices to quality outcomes. At an extreme information collected at the retail level around customer preference can be used to inform genetic selection.

Increasing data collection and data sharing will benefit every stage of the supply chain. It will increase efficiency, lower costs, and reduce waste. In less vertically integrated supply chains, the challenge with data is to incentivise the primary producer to take the effort to gather the information in the first place. Promise of premiums has been the customary incentive in programs such as organics markets but this has had limited success and by their very nature premiums are not scalable. To increase data collection at scale, data must be shown to have intrinsic, real world, economic value. For data to have value it must be shared, processed, packaged, and have a market. To have a robust market an industry ecosystem approach is key.

The carbon offset market may be a tipping point for data in agriculture. While there is much debate around what data should be collected, how it should be collected and even if carbon offsets should exist, this market is building a framework which decouples farm data from crops and gives it intrinsic value. While much of this market is still in flux, the basics of harvesting and processing data, regulating its quality, validating, and marketing are being set in place. Farmers who can bring this data to market are directly rewarded and often find themselves able to use this data for other financial incentives including clean water or biodiversity incentives. Partners with carbon offset programs find themselves able to make money from adding a service to both farmers and carbon offset hungry clients. Furthermore, several of these industry partners can themselves use these programs to market climate friendly products to farmers or increase their social license in an increasingly value oriented consumer market. As more primary producers realize the economic benefits of collecting and sharing data those industry partners that understand the potential of data will be the next winners in the agriculture 4.0 revolution.

Governments have never been in a storm like the one we’re in today, and national and local administrations need to reinvent themselves as a new era is about to start.

In these unprecedented times, European governments are aiming to improve their ability to withstand long-term volatility and uncertainty, particularly through digital trust and operational resilience programmes.

In doing so, new business models will emerge to fulfil current and future challenges:

  • Allocating the Recovery and Resilience Funds to the right priorities and purposes
  • Selecting the right technologies to achieve short-term efficiency and long-term resilience
  • Improving the citizen and civil servant experience by making the most of technology but also implementing deep cultural and organisational transformation to enable them to reimagine service delivery

IDC conducted an in-depth survey, including 230 senior executives and directors, to investigate the strategic business priorities and key action plans for European governments. The survey looked at the technology solutions that governments are investing in to execute their strategy and action plans, and the challenges they face in their strategic technology innovation investments.

European Government Business Transformation and Technology Priorities

According to the 230 European government decision makers that IDC interviewed:

  • Their main purpose is to improve citizen experience and quality of life. By keeping this in mind, they might also facilitate other short-term initiatives. This goal must become a state-of-mind for every civil servant and government decision maker.
  • The main barriers to innovation are not only budget (with RFFs impacted by fast-growing inflation) but also citizen trust and outdated IT. Again, both technical and cultural changes should occur simultaneously to regain trust.
  • Redesigning services and business processes around the needs of citizens are key steps to achieve resilience. Technology is a critical part of this transformation, but it should go hand in hand with innovative approaches and a greater focus on change. European governments believe that governance, risk and compliance and data management tools are critical to execute digital trust programmes. Digital sovereignty is frequently discussed by European policymakers, but our survey shows that only civil servants in some countries, such as France and Germany, are already prioritising it to increase digital trust.
  • Emerging technologies such as 5G, AR/VR and edge computing are key areas of investment to imagine new ways of delivering public services.
  • European governments that want to master a citizen-centric approach are adjusting their KPIs accordingly and aggregating data to build a holistic view of citizen needs and implement the once-only principle.
  • Long-term challenges — especially sustainability — can’t be fought alone. Governments’ ability to work closely with an ecosystem, through data sharing and massive investments in data capabilities, will be key.

What Are the Key Components of a Disruptive Approach?

Check out the following IDC European government “PRIME” survey studies (subscription required) to learn more about how European governments are aligning technology investment to societal Purposes, strengthening Resilience, Imagining new service delivery models, Mastering citizen and employee centricity, and opening up to the Ecosystem:

Remi Letemple - Senior Research Analyst, IDC Government Insights - IDC

Remi Letemple leads IDC’s Worldwide Sustainable Transportation and Smart Vehicles Strategies service, where he provides strategic guidance and thought leadership on the future of mobility and transportation. Operating at a global level, he is recognized as a subject matter expert in smart mobility and transportation technologies—including connected, autonomous, shared, and electric mobility—enabled by software-defined vehicle (SDV) architectures, over-the-air (OTA) updates, cloud and edge platforms, and AI, including generative AI.

We define a digital business as a business in which value creation is based on the use of digital technologies, including:

  • Internal and external processes
  • How an organisation engages with customers, citizens, suppliers and partners
  • How it attracts, manages and retains employees and talent
  • What products, services and experiences it provides, and how

So, digital is central to organisations, from the business core to all the different parts that make up the wider business. But why are use cases important? What’s their role in the digital business?

The answer is simple. As use cases are discrete-funded projects to support a business’ goals leveraging key enabling technologies, use cases are the critical building blocks that help them to become a digital business.

IDC EMEA’s Future Enterprise Resilience Survey, October 2021 (n = 430) shows that 60% of EMEA companies say use cases are important to drive digital strategies and road maps, but that organisations need to understand how to build on them for their business and how to make them work.

While you are reading this blogpost, there are numerous executives lost the in the “use case ocean” asking themselves and their board questions such as:

  • What are the key resources we need to have in place?
  • Who should steer them?
  • What type of technology investments should we make?
  • How do we measure outcomes from this project?

How can organisations answer these questions? By using a framework that tackles all the issues, such as IDC’s “Use Case Canvas” (see Digital Transformation Use Cases in 2022: A “Use Case Canvas” for the Top 10 EMEA Use Cases).

The use case canvas is a framework designed to easily map top level use case requirements, from IT components and resources to measurable metrics, to evaluate the successful implementation and personas required to ensure a successful implementation.

To better understand this, let’s look at a practical example in the customer experience space.

360-Degree Customer and Client Management: An Example

If you’re working on a use case to better manage customers and clients (if you’re tech vendor building your tech road map or a tech buyer seeking to improve your digital strategy) you can find yourself stuck with the questions highlighted above, so let’s take a closer look:

  • The chief customer success officer, the customer experience officer and the head of customer service/support drive, influence and steer the use case. It’s important to first decide who is in charge of executing a specific use case and to talk to them about how to address their challenges.
  • Use case business tips. Highlighting the guidelines and best practices from a business standpoint will ease the adoption of the use case; for instance, for the specific use case under analysis, collaboration is pivotal and this can be achieved only with the adoption of adequate tools and systems to ensure collaboration across different functions working on it.
  • Use case technology journey. This is the step-by-step journey to evolve the legacy technology architecture to implement the use case. This means collecting customer data across multiple sources (physical or digital) and applying algorithms and AI to ensure real-time customer insight.
  • Critical tech components and requirements. This covers the tool kit to ensure the use case is executed successfully. In this case that means CRM application, social media and online messaging, AI models and so on.
  • Metrics and outcomes. Track the success of the use case with measurable metrics: net promoter scores (NPS), revenue per customer and customer churn rate. This should give you an idea of where the organisation is heading.
  • Second only to metrics and personas is the case study showcasing tech buyers’ success stories on how they implemented the use case, the challenges they faced, best practices and the benefits achieved to benchmark the results. For more information, please see the Kone example in IDC’s The State of Digital Transformation Use Cases for Customer Experience in EMEA: Digital Lane Report Series — 1 of 5.

What Should You Do as a Tech Vendor?

With business leaders increasingly involved in tech matters and projects, technology projects need to focus on shifting from tech talk to business talk as they tend to see the business story behind the technology investments. How can you do that? By:

  • Leveraging IDC’s use case canvas to guide customers along their digital transformation journeys and understanding exactly what your customer is asking you
  • Tying your go-to-market strategy and language to personas and moving outside your IT comfort zone
  • Using the canvas to enable your sales reps to drive conversations around use cases
  • Doubling down on your efforts to bring peers’ case studies and examples to the table — sometimes a face-to-face customer lab is the best way forward

What’s Next?

Please read the document that this blog refers to (Digital Transformation Use Cases in 2022: A “Use-Case Canvas” for the Top 10 EMEA Use Cases) and check our Digital Business Strategies page for new research covering a range of topics such as customer experience, operations and workforce. If you’d like to know more about this report or to discuss anything with us, please contact us, especially if you’re a tech vendor prioritising your digital use case road maps and sales strategy or a tech buyer if you’d like a better understanding of the steps you need to take to implement a solid digital use case strategy.

Erica Spinoni - Senior Research Analyst, European Research - IDC

Erica Spinoni is a senior research analyst for the European Research Team. Based in Milan, Spinoni supports IDC’s European Digital Business Strategies and IDC’s European Future of Work practices. In her role she advises ICT players on European digital business and future of work market trends, supporting them in their planning, go-to-market and sales cycles with market research, custom projects, as well as honoraria.

From Digital Sovereignty to Data Spaces

Digital and data have transformed enterprises and changed consumer experiences and society. According to the European Political Strategy Centre, “In the 21st century, those who control digital technologies are increasingly able to influence economic, societal and political outcomes. In this context, the growing ‘geopoliticisation’ of technology implies a paradigm change for the notion of strategic autonomy … the EU’s ability to defend and promote its interests — as well as its credibility as a strong foreign policy actor — is ever more a function of its cyber resilience and technology leadership.”

The European Union has responded to the challenge with the ambitious Digital Decade plan to “pursue a human-centric, sustainable vision for digital society” and increase the EU’s “strategic autonomy in tech and develop new rules and technologies to protect citizens from counterfeit products, cybertheft and disinformation.” One of the eight objectives of the 2030 Policy Programme Path to the Digital Decade is to “ensure digital sovereignty notably by a secure and accessible digital infrastructure capable of processing vast volumes of data that enables other technological developments, supporting the competitiveness of the Union’s industry.”

The programme also proposes to establish multicountry projects to develop “European common data infrastructure and services”. In combination with regulations such as GDPR, the upcoming Digital Operational Resilience Act and Data Act, the Digital Decade programmes and projects aim to put Europe at the forefront of reshaping the global data economy along two closely intertwined axes: digital sovereignty and data spaces.

How Are Digital Sovereignty and Data Spaces Paving the Way for the Data Economy in Europe and Beyond?

IDC defines digital sovereignty as the capacity for self-determination by nations, companies and individuals. Digital sovereignty is more than just data sovereignty or data localisation. It entails cloud platforms, workload software, datacentre assets, communications infrastructure, processes, and operations used to control and manage digital infrastructure, services, and access and identity.

It underpins a digital-first Europe where governments, enterprises and individuals have genuine choice to control their data and digital destinies. But digital sovereignty alone is not enough. It’s a means to achieve outcomes, such as realising the value of data and data spaces through interoperable, innovative, easy to operate and control, secure, energy efficient, regulatory compliant and resilient next-generation infrastructure and platforms.

The European Union’s European Strategy for Data sets a bold vision “to create a single European data space — a genuine single market for data, open to data from across the world — where personal as well as non-personal data, including sensitive business data, is secure and businesses also have easy access to an almost infinite amount of high-quality industrial data, boosting growth and creating value, while minimising the human carbon and environmental footprint.” That bold vision is far from accomplished. IDC’s research shows that a unified data space for Europe, let alone the globe, will not exist in the near future. There are too many digital sovereignty, governance, semantic and technical interoperability challenges to overcome. Nonetheless Europe is setting a direction of travel that other regions and countries are watching.

Private and public sector entities understand that data sharing is a critical success factor to accelerate their success in the data-driven economy. And they understand that to realise the benefits, data sharing needs to happen not only within each organisation, but also with external partners, including beyond one’s industry.

In fact, our research on the future of industry ecosystems found that over 90% of public and private sector organisations globally share data with external partners, although around 60% do it only in a limited fashion or when strictly necessary. Europe’s strategic data spaces vision is the next stage of evolution, where data sharing can happen at a greater scale and beyond industry boundaries, thanks to:

  1. Federated architectures that dynamically match data demand and supply
  2. Governance policies and processes where matching of demand and supply takes place thanks to trusted rules and intermediaries that enable secure, transparent and fair participation of both data users and data providers
  3. The ability to provide and use data to and from the common space, either for non-profit/altruistic purposes or for-profit purposes, or both

What Can European Public Sector Leaders do to Benefit from the Digital Sovereignty-Data Spaces Twin Transition?

As for the rest of the economy, public sector organisations are trying to figure out how to leverage data to improve policymaking, service delivery and operational efficiency. Beyond EU-wide initiatives, public sector leaders across the region have a role to play to:

  • Incentivise the private sector to help achieve both for profit and non-profit outcomes, while protecting personal data, intellectual property and trade secrets
  • Work with the tech industry to promote the use of semantic and technical interoperability standards
  • Collaborate with the tech industry and academia to foster R&D to accelerate adoption of technologies, such as secure hardware architectures, probabilistic computing and homomorphic encryption, which in the future will enable trusted data sharing even on non-trusted systems
  • Invest in digital sovereign infrastructures and services, for the data spaces where digital self-determination can accelerate value realisation
  • Initiate data spaces that have immediate societal benefits, such as digital citizen wallets that ensure citizens have to provide data to public administration once only, and contribute critical data that they own, to data spaces that encompass a public-private ecosystems, such as health, mobility and the built environment

Join IDC experts and public sector leaders from around Europe at the IDC Government Summit to learn more about digital sovereignty and data spaces, and to share your experiences.

Massimiliano Claps - Research Director - IDC

Massimiliano (Max) Claps is the research director for the Worldwide National Government Platforms and Technologies research in IDC's Government Insights practice. In this role, Max provides research and advisory services to technology suppliers and national civilian government senior leaders in the US and globally. Specific areas of research include improving government digital experiences, data and data sharing, AI and automation, cloud-enabled system modernization, the future of government work, and data protection and digital sovereignty to drive social, economic, and environmental outcomes for agencies and the public.

How companies are partnering with a service for true end-to-end process support that brings full cloud cost savings

48% of enterprises plan to keep spending steadily on cloud, according to IDC research, making cloud costs a focus for IT leaders. And, the majority of organizations believe they’re overspending on cloud.

Many organizations are aware that they need to improve their cloud spending habits, but the process that it takes to get there often seems exorbitant, causing them to instead disregard the changes needed to turn their cloud spending around. This blog intends to show that the time and resources involved in executing shouldn’t deter companies from making the necessary changes.

From insights to process, these two companies found that hiring a partner to guide them through the work needed to transform their cloud costs, in ways that were custom to their needs, made all the difference in ensuring that they not only followed through on executing a plan of action but giving them a successful outcome.

An international telecommunications company has migrated its entire infrastructure to the public cloud (AWS and Azure) and uses a broker towards AWS and Microsoft, performing contract management and basic security services. For both providers, a System Integrator (SI) has been contracted to provide managed services (IM and TAM) on top of the cloud providers. 

During the migration, cloud costs rose above the available budgets that had been set, based on advice by the SI’s. During migration, the SI’s focused on the project deadlines rather than optimizing and saving on what was already running in the cloud. The telecommunications company turned to IDC Metri for independent advice on cloud cost savings.

IDC Metri has helped to improve tooling, and to define processes and ways of working, for this telecommunications company to analyze and manage cloud costs themselves. IT leaders can learn from their experience that recommendations from tools, including those from cloud providers, aren’t always realistic. They tend to be opportunistic, like suggesting that all instances should be reserved for three years, and that this will save over 50% of costs for those instances. That is the same as expecting your IT landscape to remain the same within that time – this is simply not true.

PostNL has been one of the first listed companies in the Netherlands to go ‘all in’ to the public cloud, starting in 2012. Nowadays, PostNL is in the second stage transforming all of its bespoke applications from IaaS to PaaS solutions, like BI/Analytics platforms, container platforms and serverless computing. When compared to IaaS, price models for PaaS are more usage based than capacity based. Saving costs on usage-based priced services means optimizing the software, rather than the underlying infrastructure.

Unlike the anonymous international telecommunications company in our example, PostNL doesn’t have SI’s in-between them and the cloud providers that offer managed services. The application teams, mainly DevOps based, are managing the cloud infrastructure themselves. Also here, cloud costs had an upward trend, from which PostNL has asked IDC Metri to bend it.

IDC Metri has made recommendations, which were much less supported by tools, since these focus on IaaS, rather than PaaS. With the top 10 teams concerning costs, alignment has been done on savings, which has led to about 8% savings. A must know here is that large scale optimizations, such as applying savings plans, had already been done by PostNL itself. The savings IDC Metri helped to achieve were more on architecture and licenses.

In conclusion, using tools that generate recommendations is only the starting point for achieving savings. First of all, the recommendations need to be taken with a grain of salt since they tend to be rather opportunistic. Furthermore, a list of recommendations is one thing, to actually achieve savings, hereby overcoming indifference or even resistance to save costs, is another thing. IDC Metri does support the full process, from analyzing costs through setting up processes to actually achieving savings.

Can’t wait until the next blog is published to learn more about cutting cloud costs? Contact us to schedule a conversation.

At its core, market intelligence helps organizations understand their customers, competitors, and markets better, and allows them to capitalize on changing conditions. As the interplay between these elements becomes more complex, organizations are investing more in aligning the innovation process with market demands. Leveraging market intelligence data, companies can better understand market size and growth opportunities, accelerate innovation, and identify key adjacencies.

Key assets for best-in-class market intelligence organizations are total addressable market (TAM) forecasts and market share data. These tools provide a clear picture of the current state of the markets a company participates including, who key competitors are and their market shares, the expected growth rates of those markets, as well as key adjacent markets that a company considers complementary, competitive, or otherwise ripe for expansion.  This forecast and share data is typically customized to:

  • Align to the taxonomic lens through which the company chooses to view the market (this may be on a number of axes from technology to geography to vertical and business size segments to unique sales territories and structures)
  • Provide the necessary resolution of data (e.g. at the geographic groupings that the company manages to or at the technology market detail that effectively informs product teams and individual product analysis)
  • Be delivered with the latest insight at the right time, so it can be fed into yearly or regular strategic planning cycles, sales operations decisions, capital allocation analysis, product management decisions, and other critical data-driven decision processes

The goal of all of this is to create a single version of market truth that all internal parties including marketing, sales operations, finance, strategy, and senior management can use to inform critical business decisions about investment, product development, sales team focus and allocation, partnering, M&A, and more.

Building, regularly delivering, and continually evolving such a data set is challenging work. However, the payoff is significant:

Market intelligence tools allow you to:

  1. Focus on a single, credible data set  so you can reduce or eliminate internal debate over things like opportunity sizes and expected growth rates
  2. Build internal consensus and agreement on highest priority target markets for core business and growth opportunities
  3. Eliminate duplicate work that may be going on in regions/countries or teams evaluating similar opportunities
  4. Free internal resources to focus on making strategic decisions with the data not assembling it

Without regularly developed, consistent market data, mapped to your business, planning decisions can take longer or be based on ad hoc data or opinion. Market intelligence data provides quantitative analytic support to aid in business and investment management, product and market feasibility and competitive strategy.

IDC has found the best organizations build this single version of market truth, build consensus that it should be used by all relevant teams, distribute it widely so it is well utilized, and rigorously and regularly revise and update its taxonomies, definitions, and data so it evolves with the company. If this is done, it enables C-Suite executives to identify markets where they can obtain and retain a competitive advantage. (i.e., how to do better in markets they’re currently in and how to identify new market adjacencies they should move into). Sales Operations can use market intelligence tools to incentivize their sales team and resolve conflicting views between, typically, anecdotal sales feedback and central estimates. Marketers benefit from identifying trends early, validating the market for their products and services and crafting messages that are fresh and relevant.

What Goals Can Market Intelligence Achieve?

  • Identify business growth opportunities
  • Provide quantitative analytic support to aid in business and investment management, product and market feasibility
  • Identify performance in existing markets
  • Identify compelling market adjacencies that can be entered via organic, acquisitive, or partnering actions
  • Confirm market for existing product, how to expand addressable market for current offers, and how to develop new products for existing and new markets
  • Target key geographies, verticals, and other segments
  • Identify key competitors in existing and planned market, their offers, market share, recent performance

Selecting the Right Market Intelligence Tool

You need to be sure that the tool you use maps the technology world, and creates extensive, insightful data, customizing it to support your critical decision making. To do that, you will want to understand the approach used to develop these custom data sets. What are the sources of data? How is the data validated and rationalized?

IDC maps the world of technology through extensive, well documented taxonomies in technology domains (hardware, software, services) as well as vertical, business size, and use cases. Through this rich set of regularly updated data and taxonomies, methodologies, and tools, as well as a worldwide network of analysts, we deliver these customized market views to the largest, most advanced, and innovative technology driven companies in the world helping them   better manage their business.

The right market intelligence data can help you overcome product and market complexities, more accurately forecast revenues and outpace competitive forces by providing current insights that feeds into your strategic planning as well as day-to-day operation of your organization.

IDC’s Custom Analytics practice and how it can help you with reliable market intelligence data.

DOWNLOAD NOW: